Article is from March 2017, has there been follow up findings on this research?
This lapse is unfortunately way too common and puts the author as well as the publisher in an unprofessional light.
Presumably, this is the paper:
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6331/1312
Given the title, you can look up on Google Scholar:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=+0+R...
Click on the "Cited by" link at the bottom of the entry to see the 47 papers that have cited this one to date:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=6666909628793143847...
Reverse chronological sort didn't find anything that looked like a follow-up.
"A comprehensive concept that connects NAD+ metabolism to the control of aging and longevity in mammals has been proposed, and the stage is now set to test whether these exciting preclinical results can be translated to improve human health."
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155041311...