The questions, however, are: how much growth can be achieved without play store/ios app? Is it viable? If yes, how? Can art be more important for a site (and it's investors), than immediate, quick growth?
https://f-droid.org/en/packages/org.quantumbadger.redreader/
I don't believe the ads in the latter category are pulled from an ad server, they're served from the same source as real content. Could be wrong though, I haven't used Reddit in a while.
This means shitty native apps, walled gardens and DRM.
This was the case before ad-blocking was popular.
Native apps with spyware and malware were the norm before web apps became a viable way to ensure people couldn't copy software.
DRM was around before most people had internet access, for example, CSS on DVDs was introduced in 1996[1].
For a lot of people, their first introduction the internet was through a walled garden[1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_Scramble_System
[2] AOL's 'Walled Garden' (2000): https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB968104011203980910
My question is, are PWAs a way for platforms to promote websites with less privacy and adblocking? Similar to how an electron based app which just runs a website (like Discord) can also get around user added blocking extensions.
That's not "puritan idiots", that's people who are aware of the harm caused by the distribution of images of child sexual abuse to the survivors of that abuse and to their business from law enforcement activity.
The response should have been better filters for illegal content, not cutting off "adult" content. (" because in my opinion, there's nothing adulty in a fantasy artwork from the 70s which, the horror, shows both male and female uncovered breasts.)
(I believe there was an incident a few years ago where an image of an Iron Maiden album cover on wikipedia got flagged, though)
NOTE: The image is on the article above the fold.
> On 5 December 2008, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), a British watchdog group, blacklisted content on the English Wikipedia related to Scorpions' 1976 studio album Virgin Killer, due to the presence of its controversial cover artwork, depicting a young girl posing nude, with a faux glass shatter obscuring her genitalia. The image was deemed to be "potentially illegal content" under English law which forbids the possession or creation of indecent photographs of children. The IWF's blacklist are used in web filtering systems such as Cleanfeed.
You can see from my note how much long-term effect this had on Wikipedia.
You mean: "Most ISPs in the UK".
That is very different from "most ISPs in Europe" or "most ISPs".
The blocks are supposed to be used for individual pages, not the domain. https://www.iwf.org.uk/become-a-member/services-for-members/...
In the past the IWF could only take action when an image was reported to them. Recent changes (2013) mean they are now allowed to search out this content.
Those blocks should take the form of "splash pages" warning that the content is illegal. Some of the splash pages provide links to charities working with potential offenders to reduce their likelihood of offending. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/tackling-illegal-images-n...
But Interpol has a list of "worst of" content where the domain is expected to be blocked: https://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Crimes-against-children...
Together this means that a site that has images of child sexual abuse, and which does nothing to proactively stop that content, is likely to face increasing levels of regulations. It's also a pretty poor look for advertisers. I'm not saying that Tumblr's response makes any technical sense. I am saying that it makes sense from a business perspective.
Only UK ISPs, which translates to "hardly any" in an European context.
The UK is the outlier here. In some other European countries blocking websites may even be illegal unless some court was involved or the website contains outright unlawful content.
A good amount of advertisers don't like porn, so you can't monetize Tumblr as effective. Tumblr's investors want a return on investment, and the former approach allowing any legally permitted content didn't work for them, so they resorted to this. They surely did their research, and are betting that the ban on erotic material is the most effective way of increasing the revenue of Tumblr.