Review: The June oven made me want a camera in every cooking device
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Don't you think your health insurance company would like to keep an eye on your diet to make sure you're eating healthy enough? Do you want Pillsbury to send you ads after June told them you make a lot of cookies?
Seems like there is a treasure-trove of personal data to be mined from such an oven (i.e. what time you eat meals, whether you're home for lunch, what days your girlfriend joins you for dinner, etc)
I have wondered why toasters seem to be such a difficult problem. I have a good one and it toasts evenly but determining doneness for a given type of bread is still pretty much a manual process.
Unfortunately this amazing, simple, elegant solution was discontinued in the 1990s.
$250 feels like a lot for what is ultimately a gimmick. A sous-vide immersion circulator costs less than that, and that's actually ~useful~
I'd quibble over the romance part. Efficient cooking through technology is a hallmark of human civilization or else we'd all cook over open flames.
Efficiency has never been mentioned in the review, and does not appear to be a criteria.
I'd question whether a toaster-oven for toast bread would be as efficient as a normal 2-slice bread toaster. I'd suggest a toaster oven would be hugely inefficient in comparison.
Someone please do the web search and provide the answer.
We don’t use our large oven for much of anything anymore.
Also, toast is a 2-3 time a year thing in my household, so I don’t even bother with a $12 toaster, let alone a $250 one.
Unsealed shit switches in a humid environment, no conformal coating on PCB. Not even real FR4, a cheap cardboard laminate found in chineseium toys.
Fancy stainless on the outside, garbage on the inside.