Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen (2013) [pdf]
researchgate.net
researchgate.net
I guess I'm wondering does this study compare the medium (paper vs screen) or whether it's easier to read when formatting matches the medium (a document formatted for paper read on paper vs screen)?
I read a lot of academic papers and have yet to find a digital reader that beats a printer.
https://www.sony.com/electronics/digital-paper-notepads/dpt-...
It seems like if they had compared equivalently sized e-ink screen and paper, many of the differences would have gone away.
On phone, most sites that have even a remotely responsive design are easy enough to read.
I've also read at least a dozen Epub format books on my phone in the past few months, and frankly the convenience has got me back into reading in a way I haven't in years. My reader renders text as orange(ish)-on-black, and the big thing is I can read in bed at night without disturbing my partner (whereas even a small book light was disruptive). I've read mostly fiction but nothing like scientific papers, so I'm not sure how that translates, but definitely I find it's a good reading experience. It's also easy on the eyes on a way black-on-white PDFs cannot be.
The key though with all of this is that the text is formatted appropriately for the medium. White backgrounds on backlight screens are just as hard to read as if you had white text on black paper. I don't doubt it's hard to isolate the effects of format and medium, but they're tied in a way that you can't ignore one and study the other, imho.
My personal experience is very much aligned with the findings of this paper. I lose A LOT of IQ points when I'm reading on screen. It's the general medium difference, but also ability to concentrate, the context where I'll be reading, and general attitude.
As others have mentioned eInk partially mitigates some of these differences, but not all. Paper has still a big role to play if we want effective learning.
Showed increased brain activity (increase in regional cerebral blood flow) was observed following reading a novel on a tablet computer compared with that after reading a printed book.
But can we conclude from this that pixels disturb brain in general? Maybe the increased brain blood flow is good during waking hours?