Facts about smell (2014)
alicebartlett.co.uk
alicebartlett.co.uk
> Someone suggested we should be building ‘frictionless’ experiences the other day. I asked them to elaborate and they had a great point about sign up flows that I didn’t disagree with. But I loathe the word ‘frictionless’ in this context. Friction is what is keeping me on my chair right now. It stops us all from sliding all over the place like eels writhing across a canteen floor. Friction in services helps us make decisions. Amazon’s sign-up to Amazon Prime at the checkout is so frictionless I keep frigging doing it by accident and not realising. Friction is useful and important.
I like the style and brevity of the posts.
> “James’” is the US English way to do singular possessive proper nouns. “James’s” is British.
Possessive is that it is of someone. "John has a cat. It is John's cat."
Singular is, well, one: we are talking about one John (with a cat), we are not talking about multiple people called John.
But there's a special case if the noun ends in an "s", like "James": how can you pronounce the possessive part if it already ends in an s? Apparently, the US does it different from the British: they use "It is James' cat" instead of "It is James's cat."
For similar questions, you might find this site useful: https://ell.stackexchange.com (or, for more advanced questions: https://english.stackexchange.com ).
I have ever since always sought this out - unpasteurised salted French PDO stuff seems to be the thing to go for - but while I now know that it is possible to get butter that smells of something, and I now know I like it, I'm still not sure I'd class butter in general as something that smells of anything in particular.
This line of thought did remind me of this article I read a few years ago, though: https://slate.com/human-interest/2011/05/eating-cheese-in-ch...
"Another said that the selection “smells like Russians”. “The difference,” he added, “is that the stinky things Chinese people eat give them smelly breath, while stinky dairy things affect the sweat that comes out of your skin.”"
(It's possible this is some genetic thing. I worked with a guy recently who would refuse to eat cucumber, on account of its strong taste and aroma, that would taint anything with which it came into contact! - meanwhile, I always thought cucumber rather watery and tasteless. Maybe very slightly gently peppery, if you got a good one that was particularly strong-tasting... by cucumber standards, at any rate.)
The fact that smell works so differently than our color perception is very interesting to me. Color perception is mathematically so neat to analyze: there are 3 or more (in some animals) basis functions corresponding to receptors and you build on that. I wonder why smell didn't evolve like that but developed so many different types of sensors. Probably the fact that it evolved much earlier is a factor (the more elegant solution was not hit upon by Nature) or maybe there is some other reason (important smells also evolved but all colors were available for training from day 1).
The phrase "the latest research seems to suggest that humans can smell up to 1 trillion different scents" is interesting since it treats smells as discrete entities, while you can't do the same with colors since they gradually change from one to another with no boundaries.
Did we read the same piece? It was pretty dry humour, but funny AF
I second this so much. Give me the juicy bits, not all the cruft and plesantries.
I wouldn't say there is no evolutionary advantage there. Grapefruits are extremely high in compounds that lower the body's metabolism and alter drug absorption. In the wild an otherwise benign ingestion of toxins, concentrated alcohol, or even toxoplasmosis from food poisoning could prove fatal when mixed with these compounds. As a result those chemicals have a distinctly bitter taste and strong aroma.
People developed that detection mechanism because it can prevent death.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grapefruit%E2%80%93drug_intera...
[0] http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2009/06/11/thi...
Check out other works in Derek Lowe's Things I Won't Work With series for other similarly dangerous chemicals. I first learned of thioacetone from him and have seen other articles of his floating around HN as well.
Also, wasn't something like this chemical a plot device in an Isaac Asimov short story about metal-plating things?
It's possible that non-diluted concentrations smell so intensely that it appears like it smells less. Similar to various chemicals where after a while the smell fades, even when the concentration in the air remains the same.
I think, a non-dark version of this novel could be interesting too.
I've come to physical blows with asshats who think it is funny to test me, because it tastes of nothing to them.
[There are plenty of other cool things on his site beyond just the puzzle collection and putty.]
I usually bring this up with co-workers along the lines of "If I smell bad or you smell smoke, PLEASE TELL ME!" which usually starts a whole series of questions mostly b/c people want to know what it's like.
I usually explain it like this: "Think of aluminum foil. Now think of fresh out of the oven baked bread. When I say 'baked bread' to you I imagine that a smell pops into your head and all kinds of memories are attached to it. When you say 'baked bread' to me it's like when I say 'foil' to you. There is no memory or sense attached to it all."
Even more interesting is that I didn't even realize I had no sense of smell till I was 19. Growing up I always thought that feeling in your nose in, say, a fried chicken place was smell and my sense was just weak (my sister has an AMAZING sense of smell). It was a room mate "breaking wind" in college that finally triggered the "ah ha" moment.
Thank you!
It's better to not make evolutionary claims!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16484712
And maybe some exceptional humans too:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/heal-the-mind-heal-t...