If you actually look at the Boring Company's proposed system for Chicago you can see that it actually addresses most of the criticisms given here:
https://www.boringcompany.com/chicago/
There are multi-rider mini bus vehicles that are dedicated to the transportation system. It's effectively a subway / guided bus line (which is already a thing that exists) with autonomy and EV tech applied.
You break down the smaller number of large trains into a large number of small vehicles that can depart/arrive more frequently. The smaller pods can pull off into loading areas at stations instead of blocking the main line, and your routing can be more flexible since each car does not have to stop at the same stops and follow the same route.
In reality if such a system gets built it will mostly be an evolution on existing tramway / guided busway systems but scaled up a bit with some newer tech applied, and maybe someday the ability for private vehicles to share the same tunnel network and for the bus vehicles to extend out into the normal road network as autonomous road vehicles to get closer to rider sources and destinations.
I've noticed that Musk has a tendency to get buried in the weeds of what he considers cool and exciting and sometimes fail to deliver the point (and reality) of what they're actually working on in his presentations.
I may tend to think well of Musk, but I don’t think I’m biased in saying that this is a pretty bad post. Very one sided, and not much reflection
tunnels aren't new, they already exist all over the world.
He's just a hype-man.
And millions upon millions of Americans. Quiet time in a car is sometimes the only solitude many can get in a culture that values it more than some.
Yes, their very first prototype tunnel had paving problems. Anyone else remember what the first iPhone was like? Or the T-Mobile G1?
The key word here isn't "socialist." It's "urbanist."
None of SpaceX, Tesla or Paypal have been cons.