Logitech disables local access on Harmony Hubs, breaks automation systems
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
I've found their devices (I've owned a few mice, a keyboard, some speaker setups) to be durable, well designed, and comfortable to use. Their industrial and UX design teams are top notch.
Somebody up the marketing side of the chain should do some math and figure out how to not disenfranchise users. Maybe lock down unofficial APIs and require authentication of devices (which legitimate users could do). Or something. There are lots of options that don't involve pissing off satisfied customers.
But devolving into 'we want to sell new system X, let's brick some old devices' is a great way to drive people away from a brand entirely.
I think harmony is shooting itself in the foot here.
Their Harmony software is atrocious. It feels like a badly designed flash application.
G Hub is broken as hell. LGS is kind of OK but not going to win any UX awards.
Am I missing anything?
This reinforces my belief that unless there's officially supported API/CLI access & the end user can control (should they opt to) the cadence of updates - you don't own the hardware.
I would agree with a modified version of this statement. To own hardware, I need the ability to control software update cadence and be able to use the device without connecting to an external server I don't control.
If an API or CLI interfaces with an external server in order to function, and that server goes down, I just lost access to my device. By contrast, a GUI app that operates entirely on my local network is never going to stop working.
They might advert this PR storm if this if they just document the vulnerabilities that they fixed.