Cigarette smoking: an underused tool in endurance training (2010)
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Of course he nearly died of a heart attack at the age of 47, despite having seen several cardiologists complaining of heart pain. As it turns out, his heart and lung function masked the fact that his left descending aorta (aka The Widowmaker) was 98% blocked.
Technically Smoking does increase your haemoglobin (CO binds to it better, blocking O2, causing body to produce more) - just doesn't increase your ability to carry more O2 (and gloopy blood is not good for you). Also, probably does increase lung capacity, by destroying pesky surfaces used to transfer O2 from teh air to your blood.
I can only think somebody got bored at work and decided to chuck this out there for a giggle/reference-bait.
This what I call science at its best ;)
[1] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/1440278/Re...
I wouldn't take it regularly but if there were a important event where I needed mental clarity and relaxation, I may take it again.
Having served in active duty with a hard requirement to pass a physical fitness test twice each year, and being a former smoker who was motivated to quit as my 1.5-mile run slipped every year despite each time feeling like I had exerted myself more than the prior instance, I'm inclined to respectfully call bullshit.
EDIT: Err, should have read the abstract first...parachute paper.
> Improper correlation or extrapolation of data can result in dangerously flawed conclusions. The following paper seeks to illustrate this point, using existing research to argue the hypothesis that cigarette smoking enhances endurance performance and should be incorporated into high-level training programs.
Smoking is still bad for you.