Hacker News Reader

Comment by bobthepanda | Hacker News Reader

You could even say it's separate but equal.

Apologies for not taking Poe's law into account, but it takes a serious lack of self-awareness to suggest that the organization responsible for the integration of the American public sphere should self-segregate.

The comment you replied to didn't say anything about segregation. And don't say it was implied. Plenty of people of all races would be happier using a social network where the founders care significantly about discrimination.

The phrase "separate but equal" is a literal reference to segregation.

You're misreading. There are two comments in a row by bobthepanda. The accusation is that ryacko's comment was suggesting segregation. That's what I disagreed with.

Or, we could have all social networks legally mandated to care about discrimination using the power of law and punitive fines. There's no reason to let the existing ones carry on as is.

Historically black colleges were an alternative to colleges that discriminated, but that didn't make them a solution for discrimination in education.

Yes, but minority businesses are a solution for a lack of minority leaders in business.

There are articles mind you about how a lack of diversity in product testing meant that some recognition apps work better with some ethnicities than others, this may seem silly, but a minority owned company would be better able to serve minorities precisely because they understand the minority experience.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com