Hacker News Reader

The article links to a website rebutting climate science myths [1]. It addresses this point as well [2]: both terms are still used, and both terms are still valid.

[1] https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php

[2] https://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-global-warming.h...

View on HN

These read like talking point cards a politician would use. E.g. "Follow the money" is rebutted with "I could make more money working in the oil industry". That type of political style posturing does the global warming supporters no good at all.

Your thought process reads like: "Anyone motivated to solve x issue is only trying to make a buck by selling a solution."

What venture capitalists are funding these guys? https://climate.nasa.gov/

Reply on news.ycombinator.com