The majority of Americans say they did not get a pay raise this year
marketwatch.com
marketwatch.com
There’s also a high degree of uncertainty given the political situation. It’s difficult to budget.
If I break down my expenses over the past three years I can clearly identify the lifestyle creep of modern consumerism. Is this the new norm? Is this what's responsible for articles like this? Or is it just more traditional inflation?
Ten years ago, someone paying for a landline, cable subscription, and iTunes song downloads is probably paying for a mobile plan, one or more video streaming services, and probably one music streaming service.
Presumably the gig economy has also caused shifts. I track all my expenses. Last year, I paid ~$9,200 over the course of the year for my auto payment, auto insurance, and parking fees alone, not counting gasoline or maintenance.
This year, I’ve spent < $600 on transportation because I now only walk or use Uber and Lyft.
Remember though - at least in the US, outside of the large cities, there’s still that population that lives in small towns. I have family in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Tennessee. For people in those specific towns, you don’t see Uber very much because everyone has a vehicle. There is no 1 hour Prime Now delivery. The gig economy is less impactful than a place such as Seattle or San Diego.
Although maybe there were also cheaper
My family’s baseline expenditures are down except for food. Cord cutting reduced expenses significantly and buying phones and shopping plans cut that cost.
If you’re using Uber and paying $10 for takeout delivery all of the time, you’re wasting money, full stop.
I helped a person that I mentor figure out that they could literally take 7 years off of student loan repayment by ditching Starbucks and picking up their own pizza (or god forbid picking up the phone and ordering that way).
We would be spending an extra $200 a month for car insurance if he had his license - even if he didn’t have his own car. I know my parents were spending at least $500 a month for my car and insurance and that was over 20 years ago.
Job hopping is the only way to get a meaningful raise.
2018 numbers not reported (obviously), and given this being the first year of the tax overhaul, this year “should” have resulted in a much higher average increase in salary (if you believe trickle down to work, this would be the year for it to finally work.)
https://money.cnn.com/2018/02/01/pf/taxes/paychecks-new-tax-...
https://www.thebalancecareers.com/average-salary-information...
https://www.economist.com/united-states/2017/11/14/blue-coll...
No pay raise = a pay cut in real spending power.
While we may look at billionaires as “them”, people with a household income of 60K a year (the median household income), can’t dream of why people who just sit and type on a keyboard deserve six figure salaries.
No one works hard enough to "deserve" that much money; this is why kings used to appeal to divine right. Nowadays the justifications are non-existent, we just pretend otherwise because we are cowards.
While we're speaking of "deserving" our money, what moral framework do we use to make this calculus? I'm dubious you could identify a credible moral universe in which one person deserves hundreds of millions, while hundreds of millions work themselves to the bone and still deserve nothing.
When people start voting for policies that "tax the rich", the people making twice as much as they make are going to be lumped in with people making 100x as much.
As far as moral argument. How can I make the "moral argument" that I deserve to make five or six times what the custodian makes for just typing on a keyboard and creating pretty architectural diagrams in Visio?
Also, if both the person bringing home $5000/month and the person bringing home $15,000/month both have bills totaling $4000/month. The person bringing home $15K a month can build wealth 11 times faster.