https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/23/business/johnson-talc-can...
Almost as if the “free market” doesn’t regulate itself and generate ethical results...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/23/business/johnson-talc-can...
Almost as if the “free market” doesn’t regulate itself and generate ethical results...
Maybe, just maybe, the situation is a little more complex than you realize?
All that matters is profit at all costs. Even if hit with fines, the entity can likely carry on existing because profit permits survival. Regulation needs to require prison for the white collars involved.
If we stop to think about what people are serving time in prison for at this moment, and comparative impact, it is shameful. The people who willingly perpetuated this in the name of profit will continue to have the right to vote, while someone in prison for marijuana may not.
You are completely missing the point. Here regulators were aware and judged it was fine to continue selling the product.
The regulators are, in the USA, frequently installed lobbyists with profit-at-all-costs ideologies in place. It is clear that the USA’s concept of “oversight” is complicit in this.
Hard to shift those underlying ideologies.
Then what is the alternative you suggest if you do not even trust the concept of having regulators?