Plastic Water Bottles, Which Enabled a Drinks Boom, Now Threaten Industry
wsj.com
wsj.com
But that's not what anyone working for a company founded on laying dubious legal claims to water that should be public, and selling it for a profit, wants to hear.
I wish I didn't knew any of these. I wish I could have simply continue to drink water like I once did. But now I get to spend money buying drinking water or filters.
Fear Sells. What a world we live in.
I don't believe this has to be a regressive burden if approached correctly.
In brief, there is an extra amount paid per bottle in the package with a portion of that returned when the bottles are returned.
Not that I really mind, I just put my recyclables next to the apartment dumpster and they get picked up real quick.
This happens in front of police officers and I think it's not terrible for anyone. I've only ever seen trouble when some officers intervened when someone dumped the bin out on the side walk to sort through then absent mindedly walked away.
It'd be really nice for us as a society to put together some more productive employment opportunities for people down on their luck, and I am always happy to see (and tip well as a result) a cafe near me that has someone in rough luck put out the chairs every morning and carry heavy things. It's expensive as an employer to do that, their reliability tends to be lower than someone with a stable housing situation, but it is worth the cost in the long run - so long as we don't foist the entire cost burden onto small business owners.
The pollution caused by plastic bottles, and the cost to clean them up, are not paid for by the people buying them.
10c tariff for every individual plastic item should solve the problem. Use the money to fund public water fountains, and 5c to whomever hands in the bottles to be recycled.
Hey, it's OK that we're making never ending garbage, look, its being recycled!
But the reality is that most recycling was just garbage being sent to China and now China has stopped accepting it the lie of recycling has been exposed. Gigantic piles of "recycling" are accumulating around the world.
"Recycling" isn't any solution to the garbage manufacturing industry / packaging industry.
If we want a world that isn't "garbage world" then we have to stop paying companies to make garbage/packaging.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-21/melbourne-recycling-f...
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/mountain-of-toxi...
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/recycling-crisis...
A paper company was required to use x% recycled paper. This cost more money. To make up the loss, the company had to make more paper. A recycling initiative to save trees led to the cutting down of even more trees.
In the case of plastic, the goal is to capture waste before it gets into the environment. For paper that isn't a concern since it is cellulose. However, ramping up plastic production certainly is a threat, especially as the industry might react with hostility to green tech.
Starting with 100% recycling feels like a non-starter, but getting a foothold with something like 30%, or enough to sustain that industry I mentioned, could be a beginning.
Plastics can cause diseases by contaminating the food and drinks they contain. Let us keep this aside for a moment.
Recycling\reusing requires a lot of infrastructure and political will. This may work well in Western nations. What about the third world? I can assure you it will not. Third world polluting the waterways will have consequences for Western nations too. Pollution may begin as a local problem, but it always becomes global sooner than later.
Then modern fungi evolved, and the problem went away. Just like plastic, cellulose can provide energy when oxidized, it’s just tricky to break but that’s what modern fungi do.
I wonder can we genetically engineer a bacteria or fungi that will consume that plastic? Ideally, before we have drunk the water from these plastic bottles.
I could see ideally a chemical self destruct timer like "it becomes biodegradable in 30 years" but that is clearly easier said than done given issues like reaction rates varying by temperature.
Look up how ethanol fermentation is done -- it's actually not that sterile. The yeast secrete alcohol that effectively kills off competitors. A similar effect has been taken advantage of by engineering some yeasts to consume an unnatural source of phosphorus (phosphite).
So if you were to evolve a microbe that can eat certain types of plastic, it would readily outcompete everything else.
Although even if the bacteria itself is innocuous the byproducts may be less than healthy - alcohol isn't exactly great for humans although it is widely enjoyed and well botulism is far worse and I expect half-digested plastics to be less than healthy even if they are chemically inert.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/apr/16/scientis...
Very fast, that's one of the reasons we cover wood homes with protective layers of non-wood materials, including plastics.
We fight mold and termites now in our living spaces, imagine if you had a plastic-eating organism and a little bit took up residence in a hotel, an office, your car, a bus or train, your house.
Even if it was relatively slow at breaking down it could cause considerable cosmetic damage. A little gets on your laptop display. You leave it at home and go on vacation for a week, you come back and some light etching has occurred over streaks of your monitor and the screen is now fogged and needs replaced, you wipe the exterior down as best as you can before replacing the screen and are pretty sure you got it all. Your screen gets replaced, your laptop works great again until a month later you pick it up and your spacebar falls off, the plastic switch entirely degraded, you open up the laptop only to find most of the internal plastic is structurally compromised, you unknowingly transferred some of the organism inside when you replaced your screen.
Here in Indiana, sometimes in the spring and summer, there's this fungus called 'lawn rust' that has orange spores that resemble rust and get on your lawn and will even get on vehicles (which will just wash off) but imagine something getting in the wild and landing on your car with a largely plastic body... go a week or a month without washing your car and you might get home from the car wash one day and notice your bumpers are pitted, oh darn the future plastic eating bacteria/fungi strikes again.
Even if only kept this stuff in industrial facilities, unless you go NASA level clean-room when leaving the facility it'd be damn easy for some to hitch a ride on someone headed home from work and, well, "life will find a way".
I don't think it would be that big a deal. For the longest time things were built with leather and wood instead of rubber/plastic and society survived just fine.
I think a lot of people are over-reacting to the idea of plastic rotting because they live in the Southern California filter bubble where nothing rots or rusts (because it's basically a desert) and so the idea that one wouldn't just be able to leave materials outside and expect them to be just fine is foreign to them. Having materials naturally degrade over time is just a fact of life everywhere else on the planet.
These discussions on the internet so rarely bring any true insight to most topics, but the few nuggets that are rarely found sure make looking for it pretty addictive.
Probably not, we'd probably end up making single use water bottles out of a material that miraculous.
Quite a bit worse than a bit of injection molded plastic.
OP was worried his atari would have disintegrated by now if it had been made 40 years ago out of biodegradable plastic.
I was giving wood as an example of why it might not.
http://science.jrank.org/pages/1335/Cellulose-Cellulose-dige...
I drives me mad. We solved the problem over a century ago. The ancient Greeks and Romans even solved it in their time.
The problem was reinvented by marketing, and everyone fell for it, to the point that kids are told to take plastic water bottles to school (despite the existence of water taps there), and public announcements at train and tube stations warn people not to travel without a plastic bottle, in case they have to survive without a sip of water for an hour. It's like we're all living in the Sahara desert. It's insane.
From a marketing PoV it must be the single most successful campaign in history. And given its success, and massive profits, they should be the ones whom foot the bill for cleaning up the godawful mess they've created.
the species survived without those things. plenty of individuals didn't.
We shouldn't be shipping bottles unless we absolutely have too. Ship the liquid in large efficient containers. Wanna go back to the Romans? They weren't shipping little 20oz amphoras enmasse, no they were carrying 41 quarts... apparently that's a standard too. Good job Rome.
Taxing plastic production, and properly rewarding recycling or reuse schemes would be have a pretty big impact to the bottom lines of some companies and I think we'd be amazed by how quick they solved the problem.
At very low density, applying a very significant fraction of their energy to basic survival needs that we take for granted.
But there are people that buy tankers of Evian and other 'high end' water to use through their plumbing.
It wouldn't surprise me if they run it all through a water softener too.
I would believe it if they "just" got tankers of clean water from elsewhere though. Plenty of people that have to survive off of water from tankers.
Basically it's more practical to keep the booze in the back of the casino and plumb it into a network of bars, instead of keeping track of which bar is running out.
Particularly when a single casino may have a hundred bars.
You don't want delivery men rolling barrels around hotels etc, and you want to keep the beer cool. Plus bar space tends to be at a premium.
The only evidence I can provide is I once knew the groundskeeper for a group of properties owned by the super rich. One of his responsibilities was accepting the deliveries.
These properties were in a built up residential area.
I think nice, reusable containers are key. Everyone in my household has two water bottles. Maybe one gets replaced a year, usually because it got lost. Even then, you need a decent filter or other way to get non-gross water. Fortunately, we are now on a well and the water is fantastic.
It's pretty heavy stuff. I'd assume its probably much more economical to transport in pipes than in trucks. Sort of like we do with things like oil and gas, when it's feasible to do so.
Oh wait.
The Safeway bottled water I buy when I'm in California says it comes from Sacramento's municipal water system.
Unless you buy something exotic like Fiji or NYC2O water, chances are it comes from a nearby city.
Taking 400 years to biodegrade is a big problem if you're worried about litter, or microplastics. On other hand, if you're more worried about things like climate change or smog, then turning it into something you bury and forget about might actually be the least harmful thing we could be doing with all this oil we've been pumping out of the ground lately.
If it biodegrades, then it becomes a source of atmospheric CO2 just about as efficiently as if you were instead to burn it to make cars go.
Nuclear power vs coal/oil power is similar dilemma.
They probably just seem like they get colder because of the higher conductivity of the aluminum. The downside is that they don't stay cold nearly as long as a plastic bottle. The condensation that forms on the outside of a cold can expends a lot of energy into the liquid.
It’s also surprisingly easy and cheap to make your own sparkling water. If you get a counter top unit, people make CO2 adapters for them that let you use standard 5/20 lb cylinders rather than the way overpriced ones the original vendor has. A standard 20lbs cylinder will last 22x as long as the cylinder the units come with, and don’t cost much more to exchange. A welding supply shop typically has food grade CO2 for roughly $1-3/lb as they also supply all the nearby restaurants.
If you want flavors without sugar, bitters used for cocktails make for a easy way to flavor the water you just carbonated.
It's not that recycling aluminum is easier than other materials, it's that making aluminum from raw bauxite is like the above process times ten. The chemicals are even more dangerous, the process management (environmental protection, regulatory compliance, etc) more expensive, and it requires even more energy. As a result, between 1/3 to 2/3 of all aluminum sold in the US comes from recycled materials because of economic reasons.
Plastics recycling is a much more delicate process, requiring all sorts of washing steps and finely controlled relatively low temperatures.
As for soft drinks, they are bad for your health, so just stop drinking them.
I remember as a child I would get so thirsty on family trips and gas stations only sold soda-pop. It sucked.
My experience has been that you can always find water when you aren't home and are thirsty.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-great-pacific-garbage-patch...
Trash from just 10 rivers is responsible for 90 percent of ocean plastic pollution: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/stemming-the-plas...
Those 10 rivers are all in the developing world and China: the Hai, Nile, Meghna, Brahmaputra, Ganges, Pearl, Amur, Niger, Mekong, Indus, Yellow, and Yangtze. In terms of countries that's: China, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Thailand, Vietnam, Egypt, Nigeria.
So the plastic you throw in the recycling bin in the US might very well end up in one of those 10 polluted rivers and in the ocean.
Is this still being misquoted? If you read the article you will see that it say 90% of plastic pollution from rivers are from those 10 rivers, not 90% of plastic pollution. A large part of the plastic pollution is not coming through rivers. It is also not much of a surprise that the rivers with most pollution is large rivers going through areas where many peoples live. Have anyone calculated how much is is per person living next to the rivers?
I'm not saying that it isn't important to clean up those rivers, but that it still is important what each of us do
TL;DR: Pay your taxes so the government can employ people to manage trash. Also, don't litter.
Part of our trash management infrastructure consists of gathering it all up, and shipping it to Asia, where it gets dumped in the rivers.
It is, in a way, pollution laundering.
The pragmatic reality is that most plastics, for the time being, are likely better off going into landfills as opposed to entering a long inefficient global supply chain which leaks a non trivial amount of that plastic into the surrounding environment. While at the same time providing minimal utility as base material for new products.
Tap water tastes gross in every major N. American city I've lived in. I'll filter it, air it out and chill it. But out of the tap, N. American water tastes bad. A little town in Albania I've visited once has (much) tastier water than any city I've been here.
I can't blame ppl for drinking bottled water (Evian is gross though)
Spend a little extra on a shut-off valve with a handle and install that first, just upstream of the new filter, to make changing filters easier (every 3-6 months, depends on water quality & volume). You will still have excellent water pressure at the sink, even if you use the newer thin and flexible 'push fit' tubes and couplings. I don't really have any plumbing experience and did not have any difficulty. Visit a professional plumbing supply business, explain what you are doing, and ask them to give you every single part you need. You may be pleasantly surprised at how simple it is. I think I spent the equivalent of about $80 for everything, including an upgraded valve and clear filter housing (to make visually inspecting the filter possible).
Don't forget the little bleed valve at the top of the filter container! After you turn the house water back on, it should hiss as the air escapes. When water dribbles out just hand tighten and you are done, no leaks.
This may be true in the cities/neighborhoods that you've lived in, but in most (not all) of the cities I've lived in, the tap water has been excellent.
To say that all North American tap water tastes bad is simply false.
And yet, repeatedly in this thread I asked for scientific studies on the effects of tap water, and nobody provided them. Hmmm. Perhaps "steady on" should be your watchword.
https://www.sfgate.com/green/article/S-F-s-tap-water-best-in...
The supply of the city I live in currently has a bit of a metallic tang to it, but it's fine out of the tap.
I spent the weekend at my sister's place around seven kilometers from here and the water was just fine.
I can see how people may psychologically (or psychosomatically) establish a taste difference between water from the sink and water from a plastic bottle based on perceived cleanliness and hygiene. There are times where I would rather drink filtered water from the fridge over the sink (even though both come from the same water line in the house), like if there's dirty dishes in the sink.
Overall, I think drinking from the fridge tastes the same if not better than bottled water (plus it's always chilled from the fridge), and costs less than bottled water overall (I let my filter go like 6mo past the replacement notification before replacing it). The only thing that sucks is replacing fridge filters, which are the ink cartridges of refrigerator companies.
Drinking bottled water at home when there are cups, reusable bottles, and chilled filtered water sources seems unnecessary and excessive.
The funny part is if you go 4 miles west, coldwater creek comes into play, which is famously radioactive. [1]
[0] http://www.stlamerican.com/your_health_matters/health_news/s...
What are they doing with this high quality beer? Certainly not selling it to the consumer.
I suppose next year I'll just bite the bullet and buy a Soda Stream (or some kind of BDS-approved equivalent).
The price is basically the same as sourcing the parts (regulator, tubing, tank, etc) yourself, it comes pre-assembled, that size CO2 tank will last a while (around a year for us with multiple people in the hot south), costs $15 to refill, and you can dial up/down the pressure to change the bubbliness of your soda.
It's also useful for seating tubeless tires if you ride mountain bikes. :)
Also, do you need Perrier brand specifically? I haven't seen that come in cans, but now there are more brands than ever of sparkling water that come in cans, which is what I most often buy.
Because aluminium is a lot more expensive and difficult to manufacture at scale than plastic. It's also a lot more reusable, but reusing aluminium costs energy, and reusing glass bottles requires either energy to melt it, or an extensive recycling / reusing infrastructure (like with beer bottles over here).
Re: sparkling water, there's water fountains that can produce sparkling water on the fly now. Ask your employer to get those installed.
Aluminum is easier to recycle, but you cannot melt down cans (UBC's) back into cans without blending metals as they consist of two different aluminum (the top and the body). If the cans are completely clean the big guys (alcan...) can melt them down. If there is any contamination it has to go to a secondary smelter which adds to the process.
Back in the 80s we did rudimentary recycling streaming in school with a magnet to separate steel and alu cans, but now they all seem to be alu.
Paper is probably the most ecologically friendly water packaging, followed by glass.
If the bottles are clean, and the water is clean, the water will not get "gunky". I have a few 20L water containers at home for emergencies. I sanitized the containers and filled them with chlorinated tap water. A few years after I filled them, while I was moving, the water was still fresh tasting and clear.
https://www.homebrewing.org/Carbonation-Cap-Stainless-Steel_...
add water to 2L bottle, pressurize to 20-60PSI, shake bottle for 20 seconds.
It's about convenience and structure. There are many very similar alternatives to SodaStream, such as MySoda local to me.
The main value they add is a convenient CO2 tank exchange program at places like Staples and Best Buy. I'm sure rigging your own system with a bigger tank would be cheaper in the long run, but I don't have space for it.
Israel's solutions for a water starved world are going to save this planet.
Your anti-semetic color commentary won't go far in the water world.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounders/bds-the-global-c...
The irony that the people who combat criticism by saying "Vote with your wallet" are then upset that I am, in fact, voting with my wallet...
This article is readable for me in an incognito window though. Seems WSJ has changed something?
I'm the founder of Tap previously the CEO and Founder of MakeSpace. Earlier this year I began working on a new company with the goal of eliminating the single use plastic water bottle.
Earlier this year I made an observation, the first step of any scientific experiment, that launched Tap. I noticed water fountains were not on Google Maps. This puzzled me and led me to dive deeper into understanding the beverage market.
TL;DR -- The answer is going to be carrying your own bottle (Like we all did in high school / college / burning man). But the lack of knowing where to find clean, unpackaged water is the reason for the growth of single-use plastic bottles. We've set out to change that.
Here's my thoughts:
The beverage industry is ripe for disruption. There are two glaring problems plaguing the industry:
The first is that the amount of waste created is terrible for our environment. With ~9% of plastic waste actually getting recycled, we're seeing massive amounts of plastic go straight to landfills and our oceans. Now that China has recently rejected our plastic and cardboard, that problem is going to get worse...fast. As local, city, state, and even international governments ban single use plastic (ex. European Union), the opportunity has finally emerged. In these progressive cities, I think the beverage industry will respond to the local ban by moving to paper, aluminum, or glass. But any of these moves would actually INCREASE the cost of goods sold from materials and transportation as plastic has always been the cheapest option. Coca-Cola has even referenced this in its 2017 10-K. (direct quote below)
“Changes in, or failure to comply with, the laws and regulations applicable to our products or our business operations could increase our costs or reduce our net operating revenues. Changes in applicable laws or regulations or evolving interpretations thereof... to discourage the use of plastic, including regulations relating to recovery and/or disposal of plastic packaging materials due to environmental concerns... may result in increased compliance costs, capital expenditures and other financial obligations for us and our bottling partners, which could affect our profitability, or may impede the production, distribution, marketing and sale of our products, which could affect our net operating revenues.”
The second is the decline of consumer preference to sugary drinks. The bottling industry, at one time, was significantly more decentralized because people cared about the taste of local water. Inventions like high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) created most of the beverages we grew up drinking and this taste became more manufactured. However, the health problems associated with HFCS have been enough to slow revenue from these products. In 2017, for the first time bottled water sales exceed those of sugary drinks.
Now we see Coke/Pepsi/Nestle pushing hard into bottled water sales. We’re also seeing JUSTWater (Jaden Smith) and Boxed Water come about, in addition to Watermelon water which addresses the eco and consumer preference change.
These, in my opinion, are just a half step forward. So what's the answer? Well, think outside the bottle.
Tap is going to disrupt the beverage industry by decentralizing the bottling industry. We've created a consumer alternative to packaged beverages -- a marketplace for unpackaged beverages with a group of users, with 17,000 users in <60 days since launch, who carry their own bottles. As 65% of the cost of a beverage today goes into transportation and packaging, by the mere change that the user carries their own bottle, we can massively win on beverage options and lower prices. Water is our first product.
Furthermore, sales of reusable bottles (Contigo -- 45 million units per year, SOMA ,Swell, Klean, Yeti, Hydroflask) are skyrocketing with over 51% of new reusable bottle sales being attributed to the consumers wanting to reduce their plastic usage.
An article was published this past week in the WSJ taking aim at water bottles. Specifically, the WSJ spoke to bottled water’s massive growth over the years, and how its future is suddenly uncertain because of the movement to halt the plastic crisis.
Highlights on the market:
“Bottled-water sales have boomed in recent decades amid safety fears about tap water and a shift away from sugary drinks. Between 1994 and 2017, U.S. consumption soared 284% to nearly 42 gallons a year per person, according to Beverage Marketing Corp., a consulting firm.”
That is unparalleled growth… And of this boom in the U.S., 67% of all packaged water sold has come in single-serve, disposable bottles.
While the news has decreased public trust in tap water, and consumers continue to shift away from sugary drinks, something interesting is happening...Due to a massive uptick in public awareness about the plastic issue, single-use bottled-water sales are actually BEGINNING TO SLOW.
“Bottled-water volume growth is forecast to slow this year in both the U.S. and globally, according to research firm Euromonitor. Nestlé SA, the world’s biggest bottled-water maker, in October said its bottled-water volumes for the first nine months of the year declined 0.2%, compared with 2.1% growth a year earlier.”
Something interesting is happening here. Consumers are still BUYING water at record pace because they can’t trust the tap, however, they aren’t purchasing single-use plastic. Drinking water sales aren’t DECLINING, they are SHIFTING… They are shifting towards bulk packaging. Consumers are shifting to bulk because bulk is the only easily available alternative.
Another staggering statistic was released showing that one in five consumers in the last twelve months have purchased a reusable water bottle. Of these consumers, 52% of them said the leading driver was to reduce their personal plastic usage. 20% of consumers in the last 12 months alone purchasing a new reusable bottle proves there is a large market of people who incorporate reusable bottles into their daily routine.
Beverage companies are working to catch up with the trend. According to the WSJ, “Pepsi also now sells reusable water bottles that come with capsules to add flavors, and is testing stations in the U.S. that dispense Aquafina-branded water in different flavors.”
There are in fact other solutions, but major beverage brands find they are not favorable. “A former Nestlé executive said the company’s internal research showed consumers were unlikely to take to boxed water. Glass bottles, meanwhile, break easily and are expensive to transport because they are heavy.”
“Poland Spring-owner Nestlé is rolling out glass and aluminum packaging for some brands and researching ways to make all its packaging recyclable or reusable by 2025.” These alternatives will all INCREASE THE COST OF GOODS SOLD, and these “solutions” are still wasteful.
So here is where we think we fit in… and it’s what we're working to prove.
“It’s tempting to romanticize a world without packaging,” Coca-Cola Co. CEO James Quincey wrote in a blog post this year.
It’s tempting because it is happening and within our reach.
Brands like Pepsi (SodaStream) and FloWater are growing rapidly due to their unique position in being able to provide UNPACKAGED and TRUSTED water. This is the only solution that caters to the needs of those who don’t want the plastic bottle, but still desired premium, filtered options. Before these brands, the choices were limited for the reusable-bottle-carrying consumer: filter your own water (ex. Brita), rely on water coolers (like in offices) or simply trust the tap. And as tap water continues to be vilified, and the other solutions aren’t convenient, there is a market of UNPACKAGED, TRUSTED water that is prime for explosive growth.
www.findtap.com / apps in Android and App store (Search "Tap Water").
Lastly, check out the #DrinkDifferent movement on Instagram at @FindTap. Join us with a 30 day pledge to skip plastic bottles.
Ps. We're hiring. Hit me up siruva07 at gmail dot com if wanna learn more.
If you’re here for the environmental crisis rather than the drink industry crisis, cigarette filters remain the highest volume plastic waste.
I see no reason regulation to enforce like a 6-month breakdown time on a product. Seems very sensible.
They shouldn't be able to release products that are unhealthy for the environment.
It sounds like you do understand the focus on the bottle that's easily replaced by opening a tap or using the water fountain that's found in most public places.
Likewise there's a lot of focus on replacing light bulbs with energy efficient alternatives, and less focus on replacing electric space heaters because light bulbs are easily replaced with little impact on the user (and indeed, save money over the long run) and are more common than electric space heaters.
People should know that they are going to get thirsty at some point.
Also, using cans instead of bottles isn't exactly a major shift in most people's life. It's infinitely recyclable (unlike plastic), something nature knows how to deal with (unlike plastic) and often better for the beverage (in the case of beer at the very least).
That's not really a city planning issue, it's just the way things are in hyper-urban areas.
I hope so much that I can pull off a remote job in the next year or so -- believe me, I'd rather never drive if I could.
If you read further down this thread, many commenters in this thread are convinced that we should never package water.
Packaged water is useful when stockpiling for or responding to natural disasters (hurricanes, wildfire, tornadoes, earthquakes), emergency evacuation camps, places where safe, clean water and filters aren't easily accessible or used. Everywhere else, it's really unnecessary.
Carrying a water bottle with you everywhere you go is another option, but probably not strictly necessary unless you're currently trying to pass a kidney stone.
Whereas snobbery works great. The successful (advertising) campaigns target the cool kids (opinion leaders).
However, from that perspective is obvious that "littering, disposable bags" isn't even in the same ballpark. IMHO it would be counterproductive to motivate people with such goals, since if the end result is that they stop littering, switch to reusable bags and think "yeah, now I've done my part"... it's wrong, they're still contributing about 99% of the damage that they used to do, it's nowhere close to sufficient. Right now (unlike, say, the 1980s) the minimal amount of change is very, very large - currently, achieving our objectives for the environment requires changes that would be considered radical by pretty much everyone, and political capital that no current leader has.
Raise the gas price by a few percent, and you get rioting in the streets. Would anyone have enough political capital to double the gas price, so that people actually burn significantly less oil? And would the transport reduction achieved by merely doubling the gas price be sufficient to reduce the emissions? IMHO the answer to both these answers is a clear NO, the minimal amount of change needed is larger than the maximal amount of change for which we have political capital.
Even the fuel tax, while the goal is to drive change, you can drive change by rewarding the desired behaviour (e.g. a revenue-neutral gas/carbon tax that paid back to low income folks), rather than punishing people. Maybe not as drastic a change since you don't get people not driving because they can't afford it, but it would incentivize doing something else to the same extent.
Or we could be much more aggressive about moving people to electric cars. Or we could simply invest more money/energy into making public transport better.
We could say try and convince people to fly less, or we could legislate carbon offsets for air travel.
So while, yes, serious change is needed, I think we really need to think about this from a political angle, rather than a moralising angle.
I would avoid even touching the diet angle if you want people to listen to you and not write you off. Meat does contribute noticeably to global warming, but food is culture, it is the hardest change to achieve, so we should really leave it to last, politically. It would be far better to deal with meat in an overall carbon tax solution, rather than singling it out as a thing people have to change.
We used to just use public drinking fountains. Or paper cups at the office water cooler. And kids drank out of water fountains in parks, or out of random garden hoses they found.
Yesterday I saw a kid with a fancy Nalgene... at church!
I have a pill that I take which has dry cough as a side-effect, and even I don't bring a water bottle to church. The kid's not going to shrivel up and blow away because he can't have a sip of water for 45 minutes.
I'm carrying a backpack anyway and this is a really small amount of things to bring around. It's a very small impact from a single person, but every few times someone will say "ooh, that's a good idea" or something like that and it makes me feel like the idea is spreading.
I have a set of relatives that have a garage full of cartons of bottled water (there was a sale). Their tap water is of excellent quality.
It doesn't help that our solution to dirty water (plastic bottles) is making even clean water unusable (microplastic).
Compared to bottles, it has the added advantage of being really inexpensive. So much so that, when places like gas stations and convenience stores sell the same beverage in both fountain and bottled forms, the fountain version is typically sold at a steep discount relative to the bottled one.
I suspect "natural" products like fruit juice necessarily suffer from being made into concentrates and reconstituted on demand. I'm not sure why it should be this way with soda, but in my experience soda from a bottle always tastes way better than from a fountain.
As someone who prefers fountain soda and avoids bottle sodas due to taste (i believe it is level of carbonation), this is highly subjective and I urge you to look beyond your personal tastes (heh) on this subject.
I don't think all of that really matters anyway, because the point I'm making is: anything that's bad about a plastic bottle filled with water surely must be just as bad for a plastic bottle filled with water and a little bit of sugar and coloring. Nobody has really addressed this, and I just think it's strange.
I'm fine with the idea that we should address this by drinking tap water instead of bottled water. All I'm saying is that surely the same goes for other bottled drinks as well.
I suspect people drink far more bottles of water than soda, simply based on the price of an entire flat of water compared to a 6-pack of 20 ounce sodas.