What are the best alternatives? I've read about some open source router alternatives (both hardware and software) in the past but forget the names. Also a very good HW with hardened open software could be great. Any information?
On the other hand, my Nest thermostats were bricked after a software update this week, so maybe today I'm starting to see a crack in my "auto update is best" dogma...
I've tried playing around with DHCP but nothing changed, maybe my it's my ISP's router which is a pita to work with...(vodafone).
It works best when the vendor can be trusted to only push security updates and occasional quality of life improvements. In general, automatic updates tend to be a vector for bloat, user-hostile features (e.g. spyware), and user-hostile business practices (e.g. remote bricking).
I am not aware of any, except—somewhat ironically—for some open source projects.
None. Hence, personally, I dislike auto updates.
For me that crack came when an automatic update to Android removed Exchange server support from my tablet (around 2015). I no longer had a good workflow for keeping up with work communication, which ultimately, as a sometimes-remote dev at the time, cost me a lot of productivity and reputation at that job.
Now, anything that involves my productivity or quality of life (e g. thermostat) is on a manual update process as much as possible.
If you've got less square footage (or don't need top speeds everywhere), want to spend less money, and want something really easy to set up, try Ubiquiti AmpliFi. Here's Troy's writeup on that: https://www.troyhunt.com/how-i-finally-fixed-my-parents-dodg...
Personally, I am amply served by a quad-core HP thin client ($70 on eBay) running pfSense (w/ Intel server NIC, $25 on eBay) and a Ubiquiti UniFi UAP-AC-LR ($75-90 used on eBay). My living space is 1500 sqft. Internet speed is 150Mb/s up and down, and I get that speed of WiFi nearly all over the house. Total cost was less than $200.
But I was rather surprised by the lack of almost any configuration options in the UniFi. No dedicated WebUI, just a few basic configuration options (SSID + WPA2 password) in the mobile app.
Do I need to procure a Windows machine and download the Windows app to configure and take full advantage of the AP? What extra options can I set up with the desktop app in addition to the basic configuration options in the mobile app? As said though - it works really well as it is.
There is a dizzying amount of information and options in the web UI, but it's designed well so the basics are well-presented and accessible.
The UniFi line is rather easy to configure with the UniFi Controller. The EdgeMAX line can utilise UNMS (which can be run in a VM or Docker) for configuration but also HTTP(S). EdgeMAX devices are much more powerful, allowing fine-grained configuration via SSH when HTTP(S)/UNMS doesn't suffice. For UniFi line you should be OK with the UniFi Controller software.
TL;DR: The UniFi line has a lower barrier of entry.
Something else of note: it appears Ubiquity wants users to be able to use UNMS for UniFi products in the future. That's good news because right now you need 2 controller software for 2 product lines from the same company.
I gather they have a bug bounty which is a good start, but so do Netgear and their routers are still full of bad vulns.
The real irony of how vulnerable these devices are, is that often they are based on tech that is foss that has updates to fix those issues but has been carefully packaged up inside a blackbox the consumer doesn't get to control and therefor doesnt get those updates.
Once again, why we need a "right to root".
For national security!
Apparently you’ve not really looked at EdgeOS. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/03/16/ubiquiti_networking...
Vyatta was acquired by Brocade in 2012. Ubiquiti forked after that.
The internet-facing side of my router does nothing interesting (I haven't enabled the onboard VPN, remote management, etc.) and I trust everyone with access to the LAN side of my home wifi not to attempt to exploit my router in the first place. That said, I do wonder how much attack surface is exposed to websites making permissible cross-domain requests (blind GETs from image loads, blind POSTs from <form action="http://192.168.0.1">, etc.).
I'm personally running OpenWRT on an EspressoBIN with an Atheros card, but I keep eyeing the Turris pretty hard.
Could even encourage security by using read-only flash, only a reboot is needed to clear any viruses.
To clean up the odd PCIe behavior on the Espressobin with mainline 4.17, there are 6 kernel patches required. Arch and OpenWRT both already ship them, and I'm in the process of getting them in to Buildroot. I'd expect they'll land in the mainline eventually.
https://github.com/jrb/buildroot/tree/espressobin/board/glob...
edit: sorry; 3 PCI patches. The other 3 mitigate other board/chip oddities.