Hacker News Reader

Comment by Dunedan | Hacker News Reader

This article is already pretty outdated. According to Jim Scharf with DynamoDB On-Demand you don't really have to care anymore about DynamoDB's implementation details, like partitioning: https://twitter.com/jim_scharf/status/1069056907686465537

View on HN

There are tons of limitation on the on-demand, certainly it cannot go to extent of 120k ops. Check their example, they toy with a tiny workload.

As far as I know there is no upper limit of requests for DynamoDB. There is a default limit of 40.000 requests per second for provisioned capacity as well as for on-demand capacity, but you can get that increased upon request. See https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerg...

You might also want to read about the scaling behavior of DynamoDB On-Demand (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerg...). Of course you can't immediately scale to any arbitrary request rate, but the way it's implemented sounds fine to me.

So do you have a source for your claim?

My claim is only an assumption. However, after our experience with not reaching the reserve limit plus the example they provided that didn't scale to a million of iops lead my to this guesstimate. We on the other hand have plenty of examples how to reach a million iops per server with a simple data model. But ignore me, just give Scylla a try! Our support is awesome too

It's not reasonable as a competing/cooperating vendor to claim that there are "tons of limitations" on DynamoDB on demand, and then in the next sentence disclaim it saying your previous assertion was "only an assumption."

Good to know!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com