> Can you clarify what you mean by “smear campaign”?
Yes, nearly every single media outlet spoke negatively about the tax cut while spending very little time speaking positively about it.
Take this example, one of many:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/03/30/the-r...
Entitled “The richest Americans get a $33,000 tax break under the GOP tax law. The poorest get $40.” What it fails to mention is the fact that the richest Americans are already paying the brunt of taxes, while the poorest are already barely paying any - as it should be. However, the headline paints a very biased picture.
See also the Wiki article on the Tax Act, which speaks to the media “assailing” the Tax Act, and provides examples. See this article
http://www.crfb.org/press-releases/house-passes-historic-deb...
Entitled “House Passes Historic Debt Increase”, while it may technically be correct, it’s also misleading and very biased. No mention of the near-$500-$1k a year tax break the average middle class American receives under the Act? Or the increased employment numbers?
Regarding complaints of adding to the deficit, note that aside from Fox, most media outlets - that had previously reamed W for his, rightfully so - payed little attention to the fact that Obama increased the deficit almost twice what Obama did.
It’s the picking and choosing that bothers me. Border walls and stricter immigration policy was endorsed by Dems until somewhat recently... until Trump endorsed them, now they’re the worst ideas ever. Budget deficits are fine when they’re the result of policies the Dems like... but now they’re horrendous.
I agree that the Tax Cut should have included bigger breaks for the lower income brackets, but they absolutely are still getting a break, and unemployment numbers are at record highs.