Intel ordered to provide PCI for 6 years and to take compilers back

It looks like it's saying that Intel can't have programs designed to limit anyone from sell or using competing hardware, such as AMD. They can't offer kickbacks to computer makers if they only use Intel, for example.

It also requires Intel to very clearly state if their compiler will optimize differently for Intel and non-Intel hardware, even though they contain the same instructions (like SSE).

Anyone who has used Intel's compiler and the above cost them money is entitled to reimbursement from Intel.

They have to clearly state when they use benchmarks that have been compiled to work better on Intel hardware.

And they have to prove their compliance.

I am NOT a lawyer. The above is my best guess at what that legal document means.

Intel is essentially a moral-less, ravenous money-making machine. Their two-facedness is legendary. Their "customer programs" are designed to fleece customers while spending the absolute minimum effort/investment on Intel's part.

But we get cheap chips! Sort of.

Can someone please translate to non-legalese?