But it can be done right. dev.to is a great example of an interactive web application with all the bells and whistles, yet it still performs better than most static sites.
But it can be done right. dev.to is a great example of an interactive web application with all the bells and whistles, yet it still performs better than most static sites.
I have no idea why they would do that. It looks like a misconfigurated preprocessor that thinks each fragment is a doc of its own. I vaguely recall something about them open-sourcing the frontend, so I might look into that...
https://github.com/thepracticaldev/dev.to/blob/master/app/vi...
> Browsers are very resistent to garbage markup
Miraculously so! Anything I would have attempted to design would have crapped its pants at the look of this markup, but browsers heroically manage to display it as if nothing weird is happening. I take my hat off to their resilience.
PRs welcome. :)