Linking to a blog written by scientifically ignorant proponetns of a religion who make inaccurate in dishonest links to random scientific papers is not making an argument.
Just like you are unwilling or unable to engage in debate here.
Just like you are unwilling or unable to engage in debate here.
If I disagree, I disagree by writing a counter argument. You may not like it, it may not be persuasive, but I write it.
As to whether this guy is a "scientist" or not, I don't think it is relevant as your movement commonly mischaracterizes people according to their ideological purity.
EDIT: Now I understand why you accused me of blindly downvoting. Projection.