EDIT: I take the downvotes this post is getting as proof that my hypothesis is correct. If my hypothesis were wrong, I would get actual responses or counter arguments attempting to illuminate me. Downvotes are cowardly.
Do you mean they choose Capitalism over Science (i.e. make money on the "green" wave) or ideology over Capitalism?
You're probably getting downvoted elsewhere for claiming global warming is a myth, but you're making actual arguments, so those comments aren't in the karma hole. Your comment here is just bile without useful content.
The problem with that Twitter bot is that which ever side it promoted, it's still stating "facts" without citation (as I have done). That's the problem with Twitter: it's useless as a platform for DISCUSSION.
The bot author is a spambot, not a chatbot, and is another reason to stay away from that website.
Twitter still sucks, though.
This is actually a very accurate simulation of attempting to debate with a global warming zealot.