I don't know. One of the positive things about full-on Silicon Valley bubble-dwellers is the obsession with questioning and disrupting everything. One looks at any little detail and digs into it, asking questions about how it might be different, even shockingly different.

It leads to problems and to foolishness like juice-squeezing hydraulic presses for the home, but I feel like that wackiness pays for itself when it has brilliant people asking 'what does life look like when we have solar powered robots and replicators giving us all important things for essentially free?'

Without Silicon Valley disruptive thinking, the answer is simple and time tested: the lord, or whoever's holding authority, takes all the benefit and gives the peasants the absolute minimum he can get away with giving, and it only changes when he gets SUPER greedy.

With Silicon Valley disruptive thinking, there are smart people asking 'hang on, haven't we changed a paradigm here? What else can happen?'

That may produce activists… I don't think you'd call them 'accelerationist' activists. That term is akin to posadism and implies it's activists secretly trying to worsen conditions in hopes of stoking an eventual revolution. SV does have plenty of those, many of 'em leading companies, but in general techno-utopianism wouldn't be characterized as accelerationist.