As much as saying this is probably going to get me a lot of hate from web developers, the world needs more browser engines. Simpler ones, maybe HTML+CSS only with no scripting. The idea of the Web as a flexible hyperlinked document system and not an application platform needs to gain more support. IMHO if your site is information-centric, and it's not readable in these "document-only" browsers, you're doing it wrong.
What counts as information-centric? A lot of basic things (commenting, searching, liking a post) require Javascript. If you want to use pretty animations, there's a high probability you need Javascript.
Making information-centric sites only use HTML/CSS would significantly decrease the capabsilities and attractiveness of the sites.
The problem is JS has too much power in the browser, and too little consideration for security. It can effectively take control away from the user, there's virtually no way to know what it's doing without source code audits, which are prohibitive, and the security vulnerabilities are legion.
> What counts as information-centric? A lot of basic things (commenting, searching, liking a post) require Javascript.
None of these actually require JS.
> None of these actually require JS.
Can you imagine a facebook doing a page reload/refresh every time you click to like a post? Or without loading more content on demand every time you scroll the page?
You're stuck thinking about Facebook as if it still had long lists of posts with infinite scroll. The UX would be completely different when the design constraints are different.
For instance, instead of infinite scrolling, you might show one post at a time with clickable previews of the last and next posts. A like doing a full postback isn't a big deal with this approach, particularly with judicious use of anchors. Certainly not as slick, but perfectly usable.
Agreed on built-in browser behaviour though. Chrome pushing more input types a few years ago was a great thing.
(I suppose the companies like IS because it has an addictive property, but I suspect me and others who see through that don't like it at all. Relatedly, the other popular concept of a "feed" also conjures up images of farm animals munching away at a trough; perhaps that is the real intent...)
My basic issue with JavaScript is when it's used to move stuff around after the page is done loading, or when it significantly delays when loading finishes.
Voting on posts, and well done search autocomplete can be nicely done with JavaScript, commenting itself works fine without (I don't think there's anything JavaScript where I'm writing this?)
Somedays it feels like I spend as much time waiting for pages to load in 2018 as I did in 2000, and pages certainly look prettier, but don't impart any more information.
For me, and probably many others, the "attractiveness" of sites that don't use JS is far higher. Searching the Web for information with JS enabled is like visiting a library full of books that will randomly turn their pages, jump around, and scream at you like those in the Harry Potter world.