Hacker News Reader

> So if you still having large scale layoffs then it appears that maybe the SOLUTION is not quite solving the PROBLEM.

And you were responding to this thread. Which means you were citing Verizon as evidence of your point. Which people the completely correctly compared to anti-global-warming people citing snow as evidence against global warming.

View on HN

All of your responses are blatantly telling the person you're responding to what they were thinking instead of considering that perhaps there are multiple ways to interpret things. You told padseeker that they were insinuating something when at best you could guess that they were insinuating something. If you're actually interested in discussing things instead of telling people what they believe or what their intent was, then I suggest not using this rhetorical device because it stifles understanding and conversation, not encourages it.

It's overwhelmingly clear what he was insinuating. He's made no attempt to prove otherwise in his response to me or others.

Vraxx I appreciate - Darawk it seems like you are interested in having a totally different fight. There's no point engaging with you.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com