Sociology’s Sacred Victims and the Politics of Knowledge

link.springer.com

4 points·the_grue··4 comments

The article is behind the paywall, but it can be accessed through Sci-Hub. Some of the most interesting findings:

- 43% respondents did not agree with "Advocacy and research should be kept as separate as possible to protect the objectivity of the research".

- 45% respondents did not agree with "It is plausible that women's greater representation than men in people-oriented professions (social work, nursing, etc.) is due in part to a biological component".

- 31% respondents did agree with "It is not plausible to conclude that gender discrimination in the workplace has disappeared until men and women are (at least roughly) equally represented in virtually all occupational categories."

I think this is a legal link to the full paper: https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s12108-018-9381-5?aut...

Hmm, your link has an author_access_token in it. Are you sure it's not linked to your or someone else's (author's?) account?

I'm unsure. I found it linked from an earlier discussion (https://www.annieduke.com/amazon-prime-day-cash-crash-annies...) where the intent was to share the actual study, but I don't know the chain of custody.

Here's a direct SciHub link in case others find it preferable: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1007/s12108-018-9381-5

Reply on news.ycombinator.com