The only thing we might have are dedicated lanes on interstates for driverless cars, like railroad tracks.
In city driving will never happen without AI.
This is a strong claim, but I'm sticking to it.
To me this all sounds like some type of weird meatbag chauvinism, where it's absolutely impossible to perform any complicated task that a computer hasn't managed to do a good enough job of yet without resorting to building some sort of Commander Data in our image. And, while that may be true for such human abilities as "being able to do a wide variety of genuinely hard things if they are taught, especially at a really young age" or "arguing about abstract concepts we don't fully understand ourselves", driving a car is...well, it's not that hard. Human beings in car cultures learn to do it, but if those same human beings grew up in horse nomad cultures, they would learn to ride horses and shoot arrows from horseback really well, and if they grew up in a different culture they'd get a different skill. Being versatile enough to develop any of those skills given the right childhood experiences seems much harder than any one of those specific skills.
Able to teach itself anything from unstructured (unprepared) data.