A jackal's nose for the job
rbth.com
rbth.com
I found this fascinating and the "Any specialization limits possibilities" reminds me of that Heinlein quote:
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects."
"The groundbreaking approach is based on analyzing the bioelectric activity of the animals' brain and central nervous system"
"Because of errors in "signal behavior," the accuracy achieved by the traditional dog method is only 60 percent, says Zaripov. However, the new method being used has increased detection accuracy to nearly 100 percent."
> Among other things, the new method makes it possible to detect "a false sit" (when a dog sits to signal that it has found something). "In traditional signal behavior, 'a dog's trick' is hard to detect: The dog does not smile, it does not wink," says Zaripov. "In this case, however, an encephalogram shows that the dog has a conscience. Deep down it knows that it has made a mistake. The reaction of its central nervous system is completely different."
I can imagine lie detectors being deployed to test whether I was motivated to order a hamburger because of an advertisement I noticed.
So they developed a portable lie detector for dogs? And it works better than human lie detectors because the dogs don't understand it?
I wonder if a smart enough dog can figure out how to fool it to get a treat anyways.
I thought this was really neat.
Those domesticated Russian foxes are supposedly starting to trickle out.