The cashless economy certainly drives de-anonymization, but very little evidence of "locking out poor" exists where this has actually happened
The cashless economy certainly drives de-anonymization, but very little evidence of "locking out poor" exists where this has actually happened
[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/257045/smartphone-user-p...
This is totally untrue. Tourist areas attract beggars.
Beggars may not have smartphones, but penetration in first-tier cities goes much farther than "relatively well-off members of the middle class".
A cashless economy will not only crush the poor, but also hit the middle class: it allows for a negative interest rate (can't withdraw your savings). I also suspect that it could enable many subtle ways to coerce consumers into certain behaviour: All your money is now just the number you see in your bank's app, giving the bank's marketing department a lot of power how you see and interact with and ultimately use that money.
That is effectively the reality of any modern economy.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fiatmoney.asp
Banks don't have the cash if everyone rushes to it and cashes out.
Try paying 600€ worth of taxes in Portugal with cash and all you'll get is a fine because its banned.
Try to buy a macbook? You better have a bank account because its illegal to buy it using cash.
You owe 3000€ to a friend who lent it to you? Can't just give him the money 100€ bill at a time because that's illegal too.
Anyone who says "you're not forced to use banks" or "cash has value because you must pay your taxes with it" is either ignorant or intentionally misleading.
I ended up using Walmart to cash a check (the ones which weren't hand-written because Walmart won't do that) and using their moneycard as my debit/credit card for payments. This system worked reasonably well, but I do not want to go back to it.
So what's poor in Africa or China is way more miserable that you think it is. And those persons, instead of being excluded like in our society, are either cast slaves (india), dead (africa) or in camps/prison (china).
You don't see no cash affecting them because there is no opportunity for them to be.
That is not true. I met people who don't have Alipay/WeChat on weekly basis. China's central bank beat those who refuse to accept cash payment with a big stick - Alibaba's Freshhema is a high profile target the central bank recently picked, there was actually a news article on that yesterday.
For me, I am more concerned about the fact that people's life could be dramatically affected if both Alipay/WeChat ban their accounts, say due to some business disputes. There is so far no regulation on this whatsoever.