No advantages that a css/html rendered version of the same thing doesn't have, with the loss of accessibility that you'd get using the alternative approach.
This is just "the easy way out". Justifying it otherwise is wrong, in my opinion...
This is just "the easy way out". Justifying it otherwise is wrong, in my opinion...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transclusion#History_and_imple...
With the exception of companies like FB with millions of users, the priority of creating a css/html rendered version of text to prevent people from having to click through to copy is quite low.
I suppose I'm defending the image as being the more useful of the two "easy way outs" that are likely to be implemented. :)