Sorry, upgrading your Dropbox Business plan will take 11 months
twitter.com
twitter.com
For every case that has a great resolution after coverage on twitter/facebook/hacker news/local news station there's a hundred that languished unsolved and customer screwed.
On other side may be they just streamlined the operations and the social media is the [only] customer case support database. If you look at various bug/case/issue databases with issue voting, discussions, etc - they do start to look like social media. So there is some convergence here. And may be Twitter can pivot and add issues/case priority/severity, release fixed in and other fields :) Imagine Periscope allowing to observe developers fixing your issues...
>For every case that has a great resolution after coverage on twitter/facebook/hacker news/local news station there's a hundred that languished unsolved and customer screwed.
sounds like my BugZilla, in principle if not in actual numbers :)
I gave Straight Talk a try a few years ago. It was great, until it wasn't great, and I needed some help with my voicemail. I eventually gave up, and when I went back to a "major" carrier I took pleasure in trashing the Straight Talk sim card.
[1] https://www.straighttalkwirelessforum.com/search.php?keyword...
reminded how back at Sun bunch of years ago we had "forum activity (number of posts)" as a performance review metric. They should have used the number of cobras instead - at least Sun would have made some money of the cobras skins and meat :)
I complain about things on twitter once in a while, if the company has social media presence (e.g. Comcast, for example) I find it tend to be quicker and straightforward to resolve issues.
With other options (phone and chat) it tend to be little more hassle to jump through the hoops to actually get the conversation going of someone.
Phone/chat support is managed by the various regional Comcast offices
Out of dozens of calls to Comcast support form California over the years, I have yet to reach anywhere but the Philippines.To the credit of which ever Dropbox person responded, it sounds like they might have realized how dumb it would be not to take a longer look at the situation. Shows that most corps' pay less attention to the actual support requests coming in than how worried that negative PR would be for having bad support in the first place. Seems like the cart is leading the horse
Glad to see it takes screaming in the streets to get reasonable customer service for a paid product
I wound up opening a new support request that listed my username, password in plain text, and a note that I cant login, please fix it. I knew they had a policy that if you emailed support with password they'd autoreset it to one and then email that to you.
So my issue got fixed, but you still prolly cant use 32 character password on their site.
Seems that their IT dept is really good at making repeated, pitiful decisions
My previous employer did something like this. If you currently had the $8/month plan for 12 months and chose to switch to the $20/month plan, you'd get it instantly but with (8/20) * your remaining time, e.g. 4.8 months if you had 12 months left. (This also worked the other way round for plan downgrades.) Then when it came time to renew you'd pay a new 12-month subscription fee for a full 12 months.
It's a very elegant and convenient system. Choose the wrong plan by mistake at time of payment? Want to try the premium plan? You can switch instantly without entering any payment details, and without the provider having an extra payment card fee to stomach.
Seriously, I implemented this in a few minutes on my crappy little side project.
If you want to downgrade, it's "contact support" so we discuss any issues and sort out a refund or credit as appropriate - but if you want to upgrade and pay more, that should be the fattest, shiniest, most automatic button available and give a fair, prorated deal with no hassle, those are customers who have experience with your service, like it and want more of it. The kind you want to keep the most. It seems like the most basic business sense.
To do this switch, they would need to bill the extra amount each month until the end of the existing subscription, and then start a new subscription for the full amount later.
Starting that subscription later would probably require the customer to come back to the site many months later to authorize the new amount.
We use their API to do some data pre-processing in the cloud on some of the data when it is being pushed in the Dropbox.
A few days ago we reach the monthly 25.000 API calls limit, and contacted support to upgrade our plan, as they tell us to do on their pricing page [1]. That is the response we got earlier today.
---
A company's #1 job is, arguably, to stay in business. To that end, being able to accept payments is something each should always be making better, not preventing outright.
There were some promotions on their website (not some shady magazine broker). After going through all the motions, they happily tell you that you can expect the first issue in your mailbox about 3 months later... 3 months.
How is that possible?
My guess is that they grant instant access to the paywalled articles on the site, though. If they don't, they're being stupid, trying to keep people from getting three months of minuscule bandwidth per subscription for free and also being unwilling to price it in at however much they value it.
to this day, I still can't pay for wall street journal article with a micropayment. and no, i'm not going to pay them 100$s of dollars for a 6 month subscription to read a single article.
No they wouldn't. Subscriptions for journalism make sense for the same reason endowed chairs in academia make sense. Advertising is almost always a better model than micropayments for the simple reason that it's (a) more reliable and (b) has fewer support costs.
The Guardian has it. But they are an exception.
On the other hand I tried to make a paper subscription of the Guardian [1]. Despite searching for an hour, I could find no way how to order the paper. Maybe another case of rejecting the customer willing to pay, because nobody could possibly want that service... Should have called them, but they weren't open at the moment.
[1] for my daugther who wants to prepare for her English exam. Freshness of the news is less an issue than having it it in a comfortable format for studying. She hates that many of her school books are only online today. Online could have some advantages, but most implementations by school book publishers are rather poor.
As much as a hate to say this, but their tech is solid and isn't the problem. It seems to be figuring out what the value-add is for different groups, and how to market it effectively. Or maybe cloud storage is saturated and not that interesting. (The size of SSDs also doesn't help for individual accounts which is either 1TB or nothing.)
I tried for _months_ to get them to stop emailing me. Different sales reps, various mailing lists, drip campaigns, I unsubscribed from them all but it kept coming. I eventually forwarded like 13 attempts at unsubscribing to their CEO with a plea to help and it stopped.
Every business bureaucracy should be evaluated under this metric. "Are we making it harder for people to pay us? Are we making it harder for people to pay us more money?"
And no, never make it harder for customers to pay you less or to stop paying you. It's short term thinking; a customer who has a painful experience when they want to stopping paying you is a customer who will think twice about paying you again.
That's about it as the modern replacement for 'gnothi seauton' on the Delphi temple ...
It’s always the strangest when you’d like to give a company more money and they go out of their way to make sure it doesn’t happen.
[edited for clarity]
My friend had all her luggage lost by Iceland Air a few summers ago. She spent a week without it. She reached her destination and had just the clothes on her back and her carry-on. She talked to everyone she could. "Have you yelled at them on Twitter yet?" "No why would I do that?"
She did, and 12 hours later she had her luggage.
getting support right the first time should be news. consumerist style resolution is at best neutral, and at worst still disappointing.
I work in tech support myself (L3) and am constantly shocked at the brain-dead, useless and actively unhelpful things the lower level staff say to customers.
Dropbox is first and foremost a consumer company
I'm sure anyone who is technology savvy could switch to Nextcloud easily enough, but that isn't the point. Dropbox was probably chosen because the money is worth the convenience.
Browsing it is so much faster and responsive.