In the end, you will never be successful doing so, be sure 99%. But whether they understood the bigger picture of things or not, technical needs need to supersede business needs, or that tech business will not work.
Newer Sony devices got a major version bump from 4.4 to 4.9 with their Pie releases:
https://developer.sony.com/develop/open-devices/latest-updat...
I wonder if the major version update for Sony's 9.0/Pie was due to a Qualcomm BSP change, or if it was solely their initiative? I think the reason for typically not doing major kernel updates may be down to sticking with reference stuff from BSPs. (I don't think they're offering any big updates, not kernel or Android major versions, for their Mediatek stuff. I think that might be typical though.)
Kind of cool, anyway, to move from one LTS kernel release to the next. I wonder have any other OEMs made the same move?
There's an upwards trend of people DISABLING updates because they tend to break tools they use in daily lives.
That's true, but regular distros are also faced with the same dilemma, and you see both cases. RH will patch a kernel to death ship of Theseus style for a decade, whereas Canonical offers newer stable kernel releases (although they also maintain the original kernel that the distro shipped with). Canonical leans more towards updating to a newer kernel version though.
>There's an upwards trend of people DISABLING updates because they tend to break tools they use in daily lives.
The general public is affected more by questionable updates higher up in the stack. I doubt if they interact directly with the kernel.
Things like bluetooth, OpenGL drivers and Wifi drivers are usually the pain points which love to break (or more accurately: break in a different way) when upgrading them. This causes those endless "I've updated my iPhone/Android phone and now it doesn't work with my car anymore!" posts. It's usually preferrable to keep the things working as they are, since we humans accept that more easily.