It is now completely impossible to sell a laptop on eBay
consumerist.com
http://reddit.com/info/6inwx/comments/
consumerist.com
http://reddit.com/info/6inwx/comments/
There must be a startup opportunity there.
I remember one post on YC a while back was about generating post modernism essays in response to spam emails to the point where a spammer could not possibly sift through all of them in a reasonable amount of time (and the "English" nature of the essays would make them hard to distinguish from real responses). This would make spamming unprofitable. Perhaps this can somehow be generalized to problems like s(c|p)ammers on eBay.
Maybe... but I can't help but note that anonymous cash transactions do happen all the time successfully (albeit in person, at shops).
So perhaps credentialed id is not the answer, especially since, on the web it's easy to go back and create a new account at any time.
I doubt anyone would pay even a nominal fee to make bids for buying items
Maybe listing fees (whether paid by buyer or seller) is the wrong business model.
Anyway, it's worth a rethink along the lines of "can you redefine the problem?"
What if you built an Ebay from scratch around a secure financial escrow service?
Perhaps you could place a hold upon a credit card at the time a bid was placed, release that hold as soon as they lose the auction, and charge the credit card as soon as they win the auction. Don't charge a transaction fee (or charge as small a fee as possible) -- just hold the cash in escrow until the buyer verifies that he has received the product as agreed. If the buyer tells you he has not received the item or that it is not as agreed, you perform some kind of resolution. If no feedback at all is received from the buyer in X days, you pay the seller anyway.
I don't know whether buyers and sellers would love these terms, but they should be securable, and if Ebay is becoming inoperable, maybe they would work.
This is the hard part, especially if either party is dishonest.
Ebay does a form of resolution, but I don't know if it's really good enough. On the extreme end you could offer formal arbitration. I'm not sure what's in between.
That's called craigslist...
There are certainly ways to make credentials that are not easily recreated. One example, although perhaps not the best, is to send a text message to a cellphone number.
You've clearly not seen TeleBid:
There are plenty of fools out there just gagging to throw their cash away. Note that the "current price" beside each item goes up 7 pence per bid, so it is easy to work out how many bids have been made on each item. For example, at the moment, there is a Play Station 3 up for auction, and it is currently at £38.08. Divide that by £0.07, and we see that there have been 544 bids made on this item. The nominal fee is 50 pence per bid. So the auction site has brought in £272 pounds so far, and the item is yet to be sold. In the time it has taken me to write this, there have been 35 more bids. The auction is likely to last for several more hours, bringing in at least £2 a minute, probably more like £5 a minute. There are many auctions on the site.
Basically, the site is a scam, as people pay to bid on items they will never win. But, it does prove that you can make people pay per bid, they just need to think they are about to get a great deal.
As a side note, this site benefits from having no social aspects, but is a nice example of a site that could not be built without AJAX. (If the people bidding could talk to each other, they would probably be able to work out just how badly they are being ripped off.)
PS: Also, the timeout for posting replies is annoying. Stateless servers do give you less chances to mess about with closures though, so I understand why it is this way...
Don't get me wrong, I've used outsourcing firms myself and have no issues with it, it's just Elance is no longer a reasonable venue for small domestic firms.
The only site selling stuff that I know of, and actually tackles / comes closest to solving the credentials issue is Facebook. The only problem with them is that I don't see that many listings compared to craigslist and ebay
As a seller, you don't care who your buyer is, only that you can get paid and that the buyer agrees to have it shipped reasonably. We take shipping choice off the table - everyone has to ship USPS within the US only (no foreign transactions yet, we'll add this choice later, but that's the brute force way to solve it for now).
I wouldn't have even known that you guys have system/mechanism of guaranteed payment (and even delivery?), had you not posted it here
The same is btw. true for facebook, etc. Their value is not in their technology but in their size.
This actually reminds me of the story of the Arizona Stock Exchange, which was technically a better model for selling stocks, but couldn't convince enough traders from NYSE and Nasdaq to give it a try (http://www.businessweek.com/1997/09/b3516129.htm).
I bought a laptop and 3 months later got a work laptop negating my need for the other. Sold it on ebay at a loss of just 50 bucks from the original price. Yet another reason to buy a mac. The resale value remains really high.
For selling I always use Craigslist.
I used to be a powerseller but stopped as I was fed up of people lying on eBay, especially buyers who received goods and complained to eBay they did not. In many cases I provided the shipping tracking numbers and eBay+PayPal could see the items were sent and recieved by the buyers but still they would refund buyers so sellers lose out.
They do this as it is easier to push around a seller (eBay tell you that you have to take the buyer to court but then will refuse to give you the buyers details) than a buyer (who can simply tell their credit card company to sort it out).