The day MIT won the Harvard-Yale game
espn.com
espn.com
> "I believe it was Bruce Sohn, who was the president [of the fraternity] at the time, who had the fateful call from the dean, who said, 'Did you guys do this?'" said Webster, who is in the process of attempting to turn the story into a feature-length movie. "And he had to think for a second. 'If I say yes, this could be the thing that has the straw on the camel's back and kicks us off campus forever. And if I say no, there might even be more trouble if they found out we did.' So he goes, 'Yes sir, we did.'
> "And then there's a pause on the phone, and then the dean goes, 'OK, you're off probation.'"
That's hilarious. Props to the dean for having a sense of humor.
...The internet being what it is, we ought to be able to find some eyewitnesses.
That’s probably my favorite bit. Then, the sad reality of the present day sinks in:
> If anyone were to attempt the harmless type of stunt they pulled off -- let alone the one in 1948 -- it would likely be met with a prison sentence.
______________________
Dear Derek,
Word has come to me that your campus police are holding some property which rightfully should be located in the MIT Museum. Can this be true?
Surely you have little use for a makeshift device constructed from vacuum cleaner parts, points from 1967 Mustang, and a handful of marbles. We, however, being the sentimental sort, would take great care of indeed, we would enshrine--this symbolic highlight of the 1982 football season. Please give it back.
Sincerely yours,
Paul E. Gray
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1982/12/9/boks-mail-ballo...
There are fewer hacks nowadays, and they’re usually less ambitious, but I would argue it’s for reasons other than hostility from the Institute.
That hack in particular took multiple months of preparation and was took down by the institute in less than 1 hour; before anyone could really see it. Also the amount of security and possible consequences has increased drastically in the last 2 years; continuing the trend of the last 6 years.
I have some further opinions about what you allude to at the end of your comment, but that should probably be taken offline.
http://hacks.mit.edu/Hacks/by_year/1999/r2d2/
Several Lobby 7 hacks were also left up for a while (though admittedly less obvious and dangerous perhaps than Great Dome hacks).
I know people who were at MIT then. It was, by all accounts, a vastly different place.
They did the annual sodium drop pretty soon after 9/11 and were somehow surprised when the response was different.
For smart people, they could be really, really dumb.
I don't know how structurally sound the surface was there but if I had a season-ending injury because I stepped on a balloon or because my leg fell through the grass then I'd be pretty upset about it.
Let me just say if someone did the dome hack at my alma mater 1) nobody would get the reference 2) the perpetrators would be expelled or criminally charged.
MIT at the time was full of older men who were WW2 veterans on the GI Bill. They were skilled at handling explosives.
The reputation for explosive hacks at MIT go back to the 1800's. It used to be that students had to participate in marching practice. Some wag got the idea to put a layer on the floor of nitrogen triiodide, a mild contact explosive.
So when it came time to bang your feet against the floor during the march...
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trbimg...
[1] http://articles.latimes.com/1987-05-19/local/me-1219_1_calte...
> "I would say anyone who was there absolutely remembers the event in the stadium. It didn't evoke the kind of panic that we are sometimes accustomed to seeing in news accounts or whatever, and so it makes me, in many ways, it makes me yearn for those days again."
Me too, me too.
Interesting to read some more details in this article.
Sounds about right.
"One night, they ran into another group of pranksters from Brown University"
Harvard, destined to be the butt of everyone's jokes.
I know the modern MIT prankery is pretty big, but I just wanted to say it does happen at other universities.
I can think of one group of people who would have been able to activate it. I am guessing that they had surprisingly low electricity bills as well.
They reference it in the article, but I thought that was Stanford.