Zuckerberg told execs the company's at 'war,' called media coverage 'bulls---'
businessinsider.com
businessinsider.com
It has always indicated that I should start looking for a new job because I'm not going to fit with the new culture. It's not just that I'm an anti-war hippie either. Describing your business in terms of war both disrespects the tremendous toll paid by soldiers and civilians, and indicates a "winners and losers" mindset, but that mindset also indicates it's part of your objective to hurt 'the enemy'.
It's a morally broken, inefficient and emotional way to look at business.
A previous job had the “tiger team” who would meet in the “war room”. But to the entire rest of the company they were mediocre middle-managers of a medium-sized IT department and everyone else called it the “comfy room” because it had sofas and a Nintendo.
Also, to anyone with similar delusions, a Bluetooth headset does not make you a gunship pilot...
They were not this. They were Walter Mitty fantasists. That’s what happens when people take the “business is war” mindset too seriously.
How about “the priority one support team” in “meeting room A”?
Examples of "missions":
- Invading Normandy
- Launching a rocket
Examples of non-"missions":
- Deploying a new ad platform to your website
- Writing a photo-sharing app
This battle (ha!) was probably lost decades ago, though.
Winning might be that you have carved out a niche market but that probably means you are a loser in the mass market, this is not inherently a bad thing in my mind.
Oh, by the way, he's created a surveillance apparatus that would have been beyond even the wildest dreams of secret police everywhere 50 years ago. He collects thousands of discrete data points about every man, woman, and child on the planet who uses the Web, regardless of whether or not they use Facebook—or even have an account. He put such lax access security in place around that personal data that anyone who wanted to could get access to it. And he did nothing after detecting a state-sponsored propaganda war being waged against US citizens.
But sure. It's unfair.
I know plenty of companies charge members to belong to private Facebook groups.
Great business for the group organizers while it lasts.
FB and Google have siphoned much of the media advertising money, so there's no love left.
> War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent.
-- George Orwell
https://news.slashdot.org/story/18/11/01/146204/tim-berners-...
Zuck had “I’m CEO b!tch”
One is much more likable than the other.
I've come to the conclusion that the news/attention cycle is partly an emergent phenomenon explained by stuff like this. This means you get pretty big swings from one thing to another as editors chase each other to jump on the latest bandwagon and journalists push stories to every outlet they can find.
Add to that all the PR agencies, fake think tanks, spinmasters etc who will write pieces for hire and generally tip the scales (for a price). So if you have a particular angle to promote, you hire one of these companies, they write stories, op ed pieces, publish "research" etc favourable to your angle and give them to friendly journalists who pretty much just put their name on the byline and submit the story.
Both of these seem like the kind of horrible dick moves that define Facebook as a company.
If they were truely bold they would look for ways to operate without gathering massive amounts of people's personal data or supporting those only interested in fostering chaos in the West.
If Zuckerberg was a truly bold leader he'd be winning hearts and minds by showing up to Parliaments in Canada and the UK when summoned over his company's past misdeeds ...instead of cowering behind generic press releases saying "we didn't do nufin'".
It’s just that Sheryl Sandburg has been undermining him and kind of stabbing him in the back.
Also they don't have quite as many insider leaks.
Cellphone companies like Huawei and Xiaomi would give these people test units and guidelines about how to write articles. You can hardly see candid reviews, a lot of them just do shit-tier translation of TheVerge and other English sites(not sure authorized or not).
The "self-media" cottage industry that Wechat and Toutiao (by TikTok parent company ByteDance) created, is of 99.99% garbage, but they know what content their users want and like to see, boasts "give me a pic and I can spin it into a hit story", they basically provided a heaven platform for sensationalists and hustlers like this guy.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/18/us/fake-news-hillary-clin...