When a politician says "this is good for my constituents" when it's really good for their donors, should they be banned from facebook?
Any time a politican says something their sponsors asked them to say, they should add a little #ad to it.
A singular politician voicing his/her opinion/rhetoric is one thing, a concerted nation state attack is entirely different.
I think it's interesting people are not making this distinction here.
With the amount of users they have, they are bigger than many nation states (and they also cross borders), so maybe people perceive the difference a bit immaterial?
Fortunately, decisions can be made by humans who understand social context. Not everything has to be reduced to a machine-learning classifier.