Why Did Facebook Fire a Top Executive? Hint: It Had Something to Do with Trump
msn.com
msn.com
It's scary that people like Luckey or Thiel aren't immune to political persecution in Silicon Valley. Can't imagine how oppressive the environment has to be for the regular folk.
What surprised me more in this piece was that he supposedly forced Luckey to sign a statement that was clearly factually wrong? That just seems like a way to extend the PR cycle. I suspect Luckey tried to have it both ways and got caught but I guess the court case will figure it out.
> Mr. Luckey’s donation and the perception that he might be associated with a group that at times traded in misogynistic and white-supremacist messages, as some news stories reported, ignited a firestorm. Facebook employees expressed anger about Mr. Luckey on internal message boards and at a weekly town hall meeting in late September 2016, questioning why he was still employed, according to people familiar with the complaints.
> “Multiple women have literally teared up in front of me in the last few days,” an engineering director, Srinivas Narayanan, wrote in one internal post following the meeting. Mr. Narayanan didn’t respond to requests for comment.
> Some virtual-reality-game developers said they wouldn’t work with Oculus in the future.
If I were an executive, I would have let him go. An executive cannot let female employees feel unsafe and cannot have employees asking "Why is this person still here?" A single person cannot make other developers avoid projects no matter who they are.
I wouldn't allow my company to become a political battleground and ethically I would feel it was the right thing to do (even if more people were upset).