If you think few IQ points difference (whether it is or it is not so) is enough to denigrate the entire race as stupid or worthless, you are a part of the problem.
If you think few IQ points difference (whether it is or it is not so) is enough to denigrate the entire race as stupid or worthless, you are a part of the problem.
More importantly, as pointed out in an article by Kevin Mitchell [3], a professor of genetics and neuroscience in Dublin, we do not really know of any plausible mechanism by which such differences could have evolved. In the end, if you want to do science, you have to propose a theory by which an effect can be explained and then test that theory. What Murray & Co. have never done is to provide a testable theory that explains how cause and effect are supposed to be related.
[1] http://www.poverty.org.uk/low-income-and-ethnicity/
[2] http://www.unz.com/jthompson/intelligence-of-5-year-olds-in-... (not keen on citing James Thompson here, but I didn't find an open access source for the data)
[3] https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2018/may/02/why-gen...
> This constant churn of genetic variation works against any long-term rise or fall in intelligence.
How did humans evolve then?!
Hi dang, can we please get bans for people trying to mainstream racist pseudoscience on HN?