Egypt's newly discovered tombs hold mummies, animal statues

Egyptian art had very different conventions and esthetics. But also the cats themselves seem to be different (larger, IIRC, and different colored than the European cats you're probably more familiar with). If you want to take a look at all the kinds of cat-related artwork (including cartoons which I can only call cat memes, like artwork of rats laying siege to a cat fortress or cats whipping a human for unknown offenses), take a look at all the illustrations in Malek's _The Cat in Ancient Egypt_. You can get a high-quality scan from, ahem, the usual place.

One interesting thing about the cat mummies here is that they'll provide additional datapoints on how well fed temple-sacrificial cats were and how they were killed. And perhaps at some point some ancient DNA can be sequenced? Which will give interesting data about how domesticated they were. Bradshaw in _Cat Sense_ argues that the core work of domesticating cats was accomplished by the Ancient Egyptians as a byproduct of their large-scale breeding, necessary for the raising the vast volumes of cats to be sacrificed as offerings.

It's a little deeper than that, cats were revered because they killed snakes, scorpions, rats, etc, around the house that did harm, pharaoh's having a particularity good pick of the litter, breeding was a part of temple life.

The most common cats in ancient Egypt are still around today, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_wildcat and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungle_cat

There is an [ancient] Egyptian museum near where I live. Mummies, trinkets, sarcophagi, other artefacts. The cats pictured in the article are in line with what is in the museum, in both sarcophagus and trinket form.

I know this does doesn't quite answer your "changed over time" question, but it is a data point.

I'd put it differently. Not that aesthetics have changed, rather that the technique of displaying what you see (through painting or sculpting) has gone through considerable evolution since the days of the pharaohs. And thus the aesthetics of things were a result of that.

> As long as it’s not damaging anything

And who decides that? The people receiving ad money for producing entertaining content that people want to watch? The armchair archaeologists watching the videos? The platform on which the video is hosted, who is heavily incentivized to host entertaining content that people want to watch?

No.