Letter of Recommendation: Women’s Clothing
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Regarding pockets, I just carry a backpack with my laptop now. Phone in back pocket, tiny wallet for cards that fits in my front pocket. I will never buy women's jeans with really tiny pockets, but I feel like most retailers have figured out an acceptable size. Who even likes heavy jeans carrying around so much?
Mens clothes may have changed by now, but I remember them being stiff, feeling bad unless you paid a lot of money (not a problem for women's clothing!), having limited neutral colors with no patterns except thin stripes.
I'm so happy we're coming to a point where we can get rid of gender standards for what fabric people are allowed to wear on their bodies enforced by society.
If you had your boobs made, they're probably pretty close to the exact location and proportions that bra makers expect. But if your boobs are broad rather than projecting; or set closer or further apart than the typical bra in your size... underwire pokes in all the wrong places. (Don't get me started on all the assumptions built into women's clothing and bra sizing.)
Plus if you've got an extra layer of fat on your torso or wear it too tight, the band can dig into your skin. If your band is too loose and you have big boobs, the weight falls onto the straps and hurts your shoulders.
That said, a lot of women who find their bras painful are wearing the wrong size.
THis article doesnt have any pics - but if youre not familiar with FInnish Street Wear Style (or whatever name they are going by these days) - check it out, but although they feel themselves to be daring on the fashion scale - I just do not think that Helsinki fashion is flattering.
Womens 311 shaping skinny jeans were my standard for a long time: I only have a phone (these fit lengthways in a women's pocket) and a card carrier so I don't need giant pockets, jeans look cleaner without them. I know a bunch of (good looking) male dancers who wear them too: https://instagram.com/p/BUME5JpFhja/
Women's slogan shirts tend to be more upbeat, interesting and aggressive than men's. Get plus size / curve brands so they actually fit: https://instagram.com/p/BQ5VkrAArJ7 Watch out for super wide necks! These are common and won't look good on a guy.
Hair sucks, but t shirt is Forever 21 curve label: https://instagram.com/p/BTs5T27Fwok/
Women's tanks are basically the same - look at reebok's womens range (WITTY THING HERE) versus mens (I LIKE DOING THE THING) https://instagram.com/p/BOXHnC5g_S7/
I have a rocking set of petrol blue sparkly converse in men's sizes - if you like color, nearly all 'womens' chucks can be found in men's sizes.
In short: innovate your own personal fashion style to expand your creative side by abandoning fashion rules.
The phenomena goes beyond just clothes, and includes makeup and grooming as well. There's a whole library of things that are available for managing your personal appearance, but men typically feel ashamed to try them out.
For example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWyuB-Qyqu8
But that stuff is labelled 'girls stuff' and pretty aggressively mocked, yet we are much more comfortable when women are 'just one of the guys'. We're going to need more than just the occasional NY Times article to change that deeply held value.
There are many, many grooming products available for men with socially acceptable use, yet that market is much smaller compared to women. Even if the social constraints were shattered, would it really move the needle?
A really attractive person might still look good in an ill fitting piece, but they’d probably look even better in something that fit well.
When the church ruled the roost the important people in the church would be wearing clothes that we recognise as robes but are essentially women's clothes.
Men have cars and watches to show their wealth, in previous times garments would be more decorative for 'high value' males, with wealth to flaunt. So again 'crossing over' was possible but different.
I can't think of an era where wearing women's clothes was desirable for straight male peasants though. But, for high status males, women's clothing seems to be a common thread in history and across lots of different cultures.
FYI, that’s because Christian vestments are descended directly from men’s clothing in the late Roman Empire, where men who weren’t clergy also wore robes. I don’t think they were “women’s clothes” unless you define all robes and dresses to be female specific.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnOVKtBxSv0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=su3HiXOjrfA
Prince had long hair and wore more colorful, feminine clothing. Madonna wore a mix of masculine and feminine stuff. There are probably lots of other examples.
A lot of big stars actually end up admired and even emulated to some degree. They do this and typically make it look good.
That observation plus firsthand experience suggests that doing it and making it look good goes a long ways towards other people being okay with it. So get an education in design. Learn a little something about working with color and that sort of thing and go to town to your heart's content, just take a look in the mirror and try to be something someone envies and most people won't care that you cross-shop.
Not talking dresses and stiletto heals, just jeans and T's
I've found so many great shirts that I'm in between sizes on. And most men's shirts are so bland and boring. Men's fashion sucks.
I do think women have fare more variety and selection at their hands when going shopping. I wish we had all these options as men too.
It does strike me that if society nudges men a little towards buying clothing “out of need” then I could see how the market expresses more conservative options.
Sounds like this guy just found a tight shirt. If you're wearing stretchy baby tees and extremely tight jeans, I don't think shape is an issue. You might as well be wearing saran wrap or a bodysuit.
Quality is shit. If you want your favorite X to last or continue to fit correctly more than a year, laundering is a pain in the ass.
I've only experienced this in poor clothing. T-Shirts don't have it, button down shirts don't have it, blouses don't have it, dresses will allow for some 'leeway', but can be worn with 'flat chests'. Padded bra's are really for making your boobs look better, not really any function.
>often meant to be worn very tightly
Tight is totally dependent on your size and what you prefer. I can buy women's clothing that's too big for me and feel comfortable but still have the fit cut. If you're looking at yoga pants, sure. There's also a difference between "tight" and fitting close to your skin, which is very comfortable in my opinion. A lot of women's material's are stretchy where men's aren't.
>it's flimsy
I don't agree. I have $15 jeans from Old Navy that I bought in 2011 that are still going strong. I never buy anything that's super flimsy in the first place, which is terribly easy to do even for cheap. Material on women's clothes almost always feels better than comparable priced items in Men's clothes as well.
Darts actually allow me to wear blouses and tops that follow my shape and curves properly. I don't see why they would be an issue for smaller busted women? The darts allow the fabric to follow your body rather than just drape straight. I see those types of shirts being modeled and worn on smaller busted women all the time and they seem to look good. If you look at expensive fitted blouses they all have darts since they make the shirt fit the body rather than just drape loosely and straight on everyone . Women follow all shapes and sizes and its important to have all styles avaliable so that everyone can find something that works well.
If a woman dislikes a boy who looks like a girl, it's not because she hates her own gender. It's simply because most women prefer a masculine man. She's likely going to give up a huge part of her life to have children, and wanting someone physically capable of protecting her (even of she doesn't need that much protecting) is important. Hence masculine is considered attractive and society values attractive people.
If you think this is just someone trying to defend traditional gender roles: I'm a guy who occasionally women's clothing, bakes, spends massive amounts of time in commercial dance classes, has done pole before, and looks great in booty shorts. I'm just being real. Straight women - the vast majority of them - find masculine men attractive and it's not because they hate women.
The problem here isn't just that they (in the best case) mix up what is (was) and what aught to be.
It's just that your argument has nothing to do with the question? Because you could just as easily make the same kind of argument for why feminine women are considered more beautiful, in perfect symmetry with your argument. Yet OP was wondering specifically about an asymmetric cultural standard.
Well yes, feminine women are considered more beautiful. Many women often wear more masculine clothing to hide their femininity for this exact reason. And yes, in the same way being unmasculine men are not highly valued by women, unfeminine women are not highly valued by men. Too much hair, or a taste in baggy flannel clothing makes a woman feel less loved by society in the same way. The culture is pretty consistent here.
You may find biology tired, but it's motivating most life including our own. That the observation is common doesn't invalidate it, any more than the year-zero style narrative about everyone hating women being fashionable invalidate them. The truth exists independently of popularity and fashion.
A minor point, but it's a book by Ian McEwan. He also wrote Enduring Love and Atonement (also great films).