Why nobody thought about that?
Why nobody thought about that?
Thanks for your hard work! It would be great if you could share more in this discussion.
> The data exists in at least four different legal regimes.
Doesn't redundancy have a negative effect in this scenario? I would think four legal regimes would very approximately quadruple exposure. If they can't get you in one regime, they'll get you in another.
This is evidently wrong.
You might want to alter your word choice a bit. As an American, “must be convicted” reads as “must be found guilty in court”, which I’m pretty sure isn’t what you meant. Even changing the order to “brave, convicted and honest” would help — putting the ambiguous item in the middle of the list helps to clarify which meaning you intended.