New kid came fresh from a PhD program at a credible university and thought the purpose of a university lecturer was to teach to a minimum standard. The naivete!
This is at a large state school in the Southern US.
New kid came fresh from a PhD program at a credible university and thought the purpose of a university lecturer was to teach to a minimum standard. The naivete!
This is at a large state school in the Southern US.
The majority of my class struggled with mathematical induction, which literally has two steps and is not designed to present a challenge. The C programming assignment that required a simple use of fork()? A major problem for a lot of people. I could go on and on about it.
The only upside is that every single professor I've had seems to enjoy passing on knowledge when you're actually interested. I've had 500+ word replies to questions I've asked on the forums. I've had professors help me weeks after a unit has finished with problems that are only slightly related to what they taught. If you treat your university experience as an opportunity to learn and have exposure to brilliant people then it is really productive.
If they depend on marks and references so much, resourceful students will focus on acquiring those.
[1] http://www.overcomingbias.com/2010/08/school-isnt-about-lear...
K-12 is actually more about enforcing cultural norms of dilligence, punctuality and ideally some civic norms.
Higher ed (paraphrasing Peter Thiel) is a mix between insurance and a tournament. It is _supposed_ to ensure a basic living standard. But it's also a competitive tournament where the high prestige colleges grant access to higher pay/prestige careers.
No, it's not.
https://www.businessinsider.com/is-college-a-waste-of-time-a...