Free to use, not free software. I cannot imagine doing anything remotely Photoshop-related in a web browser...
> There was about 1.5 millions of visitors in October
Visitors do not equal users. If those were even 1% of that it would be impressive.
I do that all the time, we might have different definitions of what photoshop-related is, but I often use pixlr.com to cut faces out of photos and put them on other things. I will check out his product
This is a tiny fraction of what Photoshop does. Even back in the mid-2000s, when I was a graphics designer, I rarely used Photoshop for simple work like that. It would have been the equivalent of using a nail gun for a single nail to hang a photo frame. You could do it, but the $10 hammer in the shed will work just fine.
He says he opensourced about 30% of it.
Really? They already made Lightroom in browser making use of WASM.
* It's free
* It loads so much faster, and the interface is in my opinion just as responsive as photoshop.
* It doesn't require 200+ Meg of space on my hard drive
* I can use it wherever, on any computer that has an internet connection.
* And it has all the features I need in a photo editing tool.
The only drawback for me is that it was flash based and now I found a html5 version and I think I'm in love with Photopea now.