No its really because:
1 In order for hr to justify themselves.
2 As a hypocritical way to cut the pay quanta.
1 In order for hr to justify themselves.
2 As a hypocritical way to cut the pay quanta.
Off the top of my head: Healthcare (especially in the US - as a non-native I was truly shocked the amount of HR time that is spent managing this...), benefits, immigration issues, legal disputes, compliance, pay, hiring and firing, disabilities... there’s plenty for a competent HR team to do at most medium or larger sized enterprises that isn’t performance reviews.
What are the alternatives? Is this something we could build an automated system around? Could the functions be moved to managers (hiring, firing, pay, etc.)? It seems like moving this way would be somewhat like implementing the officer/NCO relationship in the US military.
Are there benefits for non-specialized decision making as it applies to employees?
> pay quanta.
What's that?
> What's that?
"paying a lot". So basically as away to combat a (perceived) inflation in salaries