VMware acquires Heptio, the startup founded by 2 co-founders of Kubernetes
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
Microsoft - PowerPoint, Hotmail, FrontPage, Windows Live Messenger, Visio, Bungie, Rare, Lionhead, Mojang, Dynamics (Great Plains, NAV), Skype, Defender, Perceptive Pixel (Surface Hubs), Yammer, LinkedIn, Acompli (Outlook Mobile), GitHub, Xamarin, Beam (Mixer)
Facebook - Beluga (Messenger app), Snaptu (Facebook for Every Phone, Facebook Lite), Instagram, Atlas, Parse, WhatsApp, Occulus, LiveRail (video monitization)
Adobe - PageMaker, After Effects, Photoshop, FrameMaker, GoLive, Audition, Echosign (Adobe Sign), Macromedia (who itself acquired Freehand, Dreamweaver, Flash, ColdFusion), Fireworks, plus its entire Marketing Cloud: Omniture, Day, Auditude, Neolane, Livefyre, TubeMogul, Magento, Marketo etc
Oracle - ...
the list goes on and on. A lot of these products would not be where they are today (nor shuttered necessarily) without the resources (or lackthereof) poured into them after acquisition. Yahoo tried and failed miserably in its end.
Facebook may be the best example on that list. They get beat to mobile messenging, they buy Beluga. They lose screen time to mobile devices, they buy Snaptu. They get beat again to mobile (camera/photo album), they buy Instagram. The get beat by in messenging AGAIN, and they buy WhatsApp. They get beat to video by youtube, they buy LiveRail. In a panic to not be beat again they buy Occulus.
Plus, in this case they are mostly buying the Reputation and Service Contracts, not as much the product. IBM is already mostly a Service, not product, company now.
> They loose screen time to mobile devices, they buy Snaptu.
This was acquisition for feature phones and not touch phones. Your comment implies that Facebook mobile app came out of this acquisition - which is not true.
https://techcrunch.com/2011/03/20/facebook-reportedly-acquir...
* Maps (maps from Where2 Technologies, acquired in 2004; real-time traffic from ZipDash, acquired in 2004; satellite imagery from Keyhole, acquired in 2005)
* Android (founded in 2003, bought for $50M+ in 2005)
* YouTube (founded in 2005, bought for $1.7B in 2006)
* Adsense (Google acquired Applied Semantics in 2003, DoubleClick in 2007, and AdMob for mobile ads in 2009)
* Google Docs (spreadsheets by 2Web, acquired in 2005; docs by Upstartle, acquired in 2006; slides by Tonic Systems, acquired in 2007)
* Waymo (Thrun's team, 510 Systems)
A long list of Alphabet's acquisitions are on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mergers_and_acquisitio...
Interestingly enough, IBM has even left https://www.compose.com/ as a standalone entity for now.
Acquisitions today are mainly to block competition early. While I'm painting a broad stroke most of these types of acquisitions do little to nothing for the greater long term good of the original products. What has IBM contributed to OSS in the last decade that's been of significant value? Then compare that to the money they make off repackaging these tools and "supporting" them. IBM is chasing dollars and relevance. VMW is trying to compete in a market they've not been able to wedge into helping them sell more seats for VSphere.
Both of these companies have, historically, abused OSS. It's disheartening to see that these monoliths have figured out to buy early and often. And through that playbook, ultimately, maintain control.
Find a hot niche market (Kubernetes). Play the "Cool" card on social network, and hire all the "most famous" Upstream kubernetes contributor (typically those that tweet a lot). Those newly hired contributors, make the company even cooler and there is now a perception everywhere that the company is the next big thing. The product build by the company is not as important as the hype they got (as shown by the other posts that wonders what they actually do).
At this point, a big business jumps in desperate to get some of the hype branding for that new market (Kubernetes) and pays big money for what is essentially a huge acqui-hire (mainly acquiring the Heptio reputation).
This existed before with Openstack, and other similar hype cycles.
I have no reason to doubt any of that, although I don't know what it means for Heptio's Amazon partnership, or utilities like Heptio Authenticator. Presumably that work will still continue in some form though, it would be a surprise to hear otherwise since VMware and AWS are already "strategic technology partners" as well.
The website advertises professional services, training, support subscriptions, and books. Redhat model I guess.
> Terms of the deal are not being disclosed — VMware said in a release that they are not material to the company
Can we make an intelligent guess about the upper bound of the transaction? i.e. would it have to be < $500 million? < $1 Billion?
Typically investors are looking for a 3-5x return if a company sells short term (< 10 years). A 5x on $33m is $165m, there’s more math that goes into so it’s easier to just round up. Which is about $200m.
I think they spent roughly half of their series B money on this brilliant plan, with headcount increasing at a steady clip. Meanwhile they probably realized building an enterprise sales and support organization is no fun, and growing it fast enough to justify ballooning R&D costs is not as easy as it looks. Given the profile of the founders - former Google and Microsoft employees with no enterprise sales experience to speak of - they were either deeply bored by the prospect of scaling this part of the company, or the board started pressuring them to bring a more sales-savvy CEO, or possibly both. It’s also possible that there was founder conflict brewing - those guys had zero experience outside of giant corporations, so they jumped straight into the deep end of the pool with a high-profile launch, rapid team growth, etc. For inexperienced founders who haven’t had time to gel as a team, it can be a jarring experience. Given that they still had reasonable runway (let’s say 12 months), they were not desperate to sell. My guess is that their number was $250M: plenty of money for the founders, and it matches the recent CoreOS acquisition. In early stage acquisitions it’s often important to stroke the ego of the founders, so that they can experience the acquisition as a victory rather than a defeat. A lot of times that boils down to a pissing contest on valuation. $250M is a steep price for a $5M business, but it’s still a great deal for Vmware. They need a credible Kubernetes story, and as much open-source DNA as they can.
EDIT: others are pointing out that the acquisition price might be below $84M. It’s likely that VMware structured the deal into a modest a acquisition price for shareholders, augmented by a somptuous retention package for key employees (basically the founders and engineers). I think they pitched the resulting deal as a $250M “acquisition” from the founder’s perspective. This is very common for acqui-hires, especially when the risk is high that the team will be unhappy and be tempted to leave.
I've had a chance to interact with Craig and Joe on multiple occasions and got an impression that they are rock solid both in their business strategy, team building, technical execution and vision, so not sure where do your assumptions are coming from?
Objectively, this is a pretty great outcome. So you could say they had a good strategy and executed well on it. And their engineering team looks great, no argument there.
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/piston-cloud-computi...
"On June 12, 2015 Cisco acquired Piston Cloud Computing, a privately held San Francisco based Openstack product company. Piston provides software that enables streamlined operational deployment of large scale distributed systems. Piston's enterprise grade software helps customers automate orchestration and deployment of underlying distributed systems for running applications on OpenStack."
"Heptio’s mission is to build a platform that accelerates IT in a multi-cloud world."
Just feels like some overlap with PKS, and both companies being Dell owned is interesting.
Heptio had none of these.
EKS seems like more of an "OK, fine, if you really want K8s, you can have K8s" move to me.
This industry used to mean something.
(And thankyou!)
https://content.pivotal.io/blog/were-looking-forward-to-welc...
The question is, who buys Rancher, and does someone buy docker?
In general though seems likely there will be a load of consolidation across the container space over the next year or so.
Scroll down to Case studies; https://kubernetes.io/case-studies/ - there are far more large corps using it that aren't listed on this of course. I'll let them toot their horns if they'd like. :)
Also, as I work with k8s I like to watch the trend of HNs "Who's hiring?" threads out of curiosity and I ctrl-f for kubernetes/k8s. Last few times I've looked 20-25+ have had kubernetes in their postings. It's been a pretty fair chunk / near-majority over the last 6 months or so.
It's a marked difference from when I got on the kubernetes train around 2015, that's for sure!