Hacker News Reader

Hah. Perhaps. But that doesn't mean we should accept either.

How to prevent that tho? Everything seems to be at the risk of either the first or the second...

Good question. The framers of the US Constitution attempted to do it with a system of checks and balances... which works to a certain extent, but not perfectly. Point is just because it’s hard, that’s no reason to give up trying.

The framers put in protections against tyranny of the minority, yes. But it's not the electoral college (which Madison and Hamilton tried to get rid of after they saw how it behaved) or fptp voting, or minority rule.

You don't protect against tyranny of the majority by allowing minorities to dictate policy, that's just regular tyranny.

You protect against majorities by requiring supermajorities for all the most important functions of government: constitutional change, impeachment, and censure.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com