The Rise of Remote, and Demise of San Francisco
medium.com
medium.com
There is no arguing that there is a public disturbance problem. But as a group, these folks are not the threatening ones. I would be much more concerned about energetic, apparently normal people who have an objectively criminal business plan: To break into vehicles, commit petty theft, or to perform their own victimization for the purpose of panhandling. These are people who profit off the chaos in small ways, with an immediate impact on public life. People who profit in larger ways run organizations that pump up their reputation but avoid lasting solutions, preserving a status quo of open wounds. The ill folks are screaming, in large part, because the conditions are getting to them, too, and they can't take it anymore.
I welcome companies and entrepreneurs that will struggle with these problems directly, engage with the political landscape and make the calls necessary to build a healthy coalition instead of blustering that someone else should arrange things for their benefit.
Putting that line right before a couple hundred words about the increasing viability of remote work is, uh, something.
Let us shed a tear for the humble bitcoin enthusiast entrepreneur, traumatized by "crack-zombies" lurking just outside his Tenderknob co-working space...
Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize.
Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.
Don't be snarky.
Assume good faith.
They're there for a reason. Please follow them. Maybe the author doesn't deserve better but the community you're participating in does.