it would mean that, if it's a real stat and not just something that was invented on the spot.

Then if we take this 0.2% as representative (and 6 million out of three billion users probably is), it would be fair to say that this 50% split would scale if more people learned about javascript.

Google will be in hot water if humanity ever decides to take on javascript.. assuming the source for those states aren't someone's ass.

>It means among the ones who know, half of them dont want it.

Which, of course, isn't true to begin with.

I think you’re confusing “numbers some guy made up” with “stats.”