> The role of self-learning algorithms would seem to be very significant in this context, since – like capitalism – they also hinge upon movement
> If the systematization of the possible is somehow reconfigured by self-learning algorithms, are the capacities of indefinite potential then also reconfigured when it comes to evading this very systematization ...
> An associationism that can never be known, a life of associating with other things and people that is not amenable to and not incorporable by calculation – is this now changing through AI?
> However, the distance between the actual output signals of their algorithms and the target output represents what I call a space of play. Indeed, the algorithm designers described ‘playing with’ or ‘tuning’ the algorithm so that the output converges on the target. Here I think that deep machine learning is not circumscribed at all by a limited spectrum of possibility ...
I don't think all humanities are gibberish, but this is. I'm sure a Philosopher would find my opinions on Nietzsche to be similarly half-baked.