https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nlsc2008/pdf/2028.pdf
https://eps.utk.edu/faculty/taylor/Miller-radiation%20measur...
Wouldn't it be game changing if we found fossils really deep inside the moon as we did this? If the impact that hit Earth to form the cluster of rocks that eventually settled into what is now our Moon, I wouldn't expect it to pulverize earth into dust but rather into large pieces. Imagine of some fossils were encased in some of the larger rocks, which later settled deep inside the lunar core.
Interesting. So far, there has been a lot of synergy between Musk's companies. But I failed to understand where the Boring Company fit (other than the obvious and boring 'tunnels for cars' angle).
20th century science fiction should always be taken as a how to guide for space colonisation. Now about that FTL transport.
> The moon, however, is dry, cool and mostly rigid, like a chunk of stone or iron. So moonquakes set it vibrating like a tuning fork. Even if a moonquake isn't intense, "it just keeps going and going," Neal says. And for a lunar habitat, that persistence could be more significant than a moonquake's magnitude.
The dryness of the Moon presents an interesting challenge to tunnel boring machines that I don't often see addressed.
[1] https://www.nasa.gov/exploration/home/15mar_moonquakes.html
Quell quakes and generate electricity at the same time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_structure_of_the_Moon
Many tubes are big enough for regulation-sized moonball courts. Together with moon dune dirtbiking, the moon might have a promising sports economy.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_lava_tube
https://www.google.nl/amp/s/www.bizjournals.com/pittsburgh/n...