China’s hidden camps
bbc.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
This is from the opening lines of the article. Every excuse the government provides seems to provide is similarly transparent. Roads close because they've "melted". Filming is not allowed, because of "military exercises". I don't know who they think they're fooling.
They're just saying anything at all. Their orders did not include what to tell reporters (and if those orders did, they didn't bother to read them)
Presumably the NRO and NGA also knew about this place, likely as it was being built. It's a shame that imagery backing up human rights violations never comes out of the IC unless it's congruent with American foreign policy of the day.
Independent organizations then end up relying on Google Maps of all things, which can be downright glacial in its update frequency. It's promising that some NGOs are striking partnerships directly with commercial providers now:
https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/11/30/new-satellite-imagery-pa...
Because it's about China, and information about Chinese human rights abuses is apparently considered "nationalistic flamebait."
Also, I speculate that giving articles like this prominence is bad for Y Combinator's business: it operates a startup incubator in China: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17820654 https://blog.ycombinator.com/yc-china-qi-lu/ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17763426
It's also worth noting that China human rights stories are censored in a way that gives the mods some deniability: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18185123 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17634964
>“There are tens of thousands of people there now. They have some problems with their thoughts.”
That reads like fictional prose, but it unfortunately isn't.
... it's the trade, isn't it?
And why do globalists have no qualms about condemning Myanmar's persecution of Muslims? Aung San Suu Kyi enjoyed a lot of Western support for decades before the genocidal acts.
Do we not realize what hypocrites we are? We are funding the very actions and ideals that we vehemently oppose. All of us Silicon Valley residents who are so supportive of inclusion, acceptance and rights... Many of us work for the very companies that sponsor the exact opposite values on over a billion people. And we claim that we aren't tribal nationalists? What are we then? Why are our strong moral convictions so geographically limited?
We should ask ourselves and anyone around us who claims to believe in a cause for freedom, rights and equality to please explain why our beliefs don't go beyond the boundaries of the United States (or other western countries). Is it fake virtue? Is it blind apathy created by materialism and greed? It is nationalism, stateism, racism ETC? What is it? Shouldn't there be stories about things like this in the liberal media on a daily bases. Liberal ideas don't apply to China apparently. I dare to think how China may be different today if for the last 18 months, the Mainstream media covered stories like this one in place of all the millions of largely fluff partition anti Trump ones. My opinion is that at the very least least a large amount of pressure would have been put on China to address at least some of this trend. Perhaps our country country would have found some common ground and actually moved toward a center on a least something. All the while helping millions of Chinese citizens at the same time.
How is ignoring this situation and actually sponsoring it financially ok with the average American citizen (regardless of party affiliation)?
Read the article and form your own views.
I have made the decision to support the Chinese as little as I can, and fight the regime where I can. In my field, academia, this can actually matter a lot. I encourage you to do the same.
Muslims arent the most popular people right now, but the parallels to another religious ethnicity in history are too strong. Dont be the one, years from now, having to claim that we did not know. We know. We see. We know where this ends, it is not the first time. Do what you can.
It ends when there are no more religious people in China. If all "goes well" for the chinese government, in 20 years it will be done.
- China will decide who the next Dalai Lama will be: http://time.com/3743742/dalai-lama-china-reincarnation-tibet...
- Building an island in the South China Sea (after claiming an atoll as their own): https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34641131
- Genocide in Tibet: http://www.thetibetpost.com/en/outlook/opinions-and-columns/...
- Outlawing Falun Gong (a meditation group): https://www.pri.org/stories/2014-07-14/why-china-fears-falun...
- Incursion into Bhutan: https://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/03/asia/bhutan-india-border-...
What they can do in a subversive way, they can, and where it doesn't work, they're overt.
And since I saw a lot of comments about Trump here, I just want to point out that if Trump runs for president as a Democrat, which he will certainly do in order to maximise his chances in the case that the previous president is a Republican (also, if he were to do so he will do everything he could to appear extremely left-wing and liberal), as a President from the Democratic Party he will certainly use Xinjiang as among the many main reasons to start a trade war with China (which we will soon see that he and his friends will benefit hugely from). The main difference would be that everyone on the Internet will cheer for him when he starts the trade war, and there won't be as many people as there are now who had experienced the bursting of their reality bubbles back in 2016. Reality bubbles are ubiquitous in the west too. The difference here is that no central system is trying to control these reality bubbles. Instead, the problem in the west is that there are platforms like Facebook which, for the sole purpose of their business interest (e.g. user retention), reinforce people's reality bubbles to be more monochrome with views on things that is very one-sided. But given the rapid advancement in technologies and an increasingly larger proportion of the human population becoming more intelligent and intellectual, eventually platforms like Facebook will collapse as everything becomes more decentralised.
And I'm looking forwards to something like this happening in China too in the next 30 years. I heard from friends working in AliCloud that they are doing some experimental projects to build an AI for decentralised governance for the Central Government. Sounds ironic but this may just be the best way to combat corruption and improve the Chinese economics and for Xi to make sure him and his friends continue to stay in power. The Central Government will be rebranded as an organisation in charge of these decentralised AI governments for cities designed to serve its citizens' needs and there will be no need to mass-control the reality bubbles of Chinese citizens. And there will be no need to resort to doing horrible things to places like Xinjiang and Tibet too.