If not Amazon, another company will do business with gov.
Face recognition is mature enough, there is no very high barrier.
Even if US gov doesnt adopt such technology, another gov will do and already done.
It is just business.
> It is just business.
Guns are a mature technology, and pretty easy to use. If I don't do the hit for Vinny, some other hitman will, so I might as well make some cash. It is just business.
The fact that someone else may perform a morally dubious action if you don't does not provide any justification for you to perform that action.
Needless to say this technology can only deploy in public places. If someone appear in public places, why you think he would like to become invisible to all others.
In the meanwhile, I agree that no gov employee can be authorized to access the data without limitation. There must be some laws to regulate its usage.
Guns don't attack people either. There's a saying: "guns don't kill people, people kill people."
Why did you choose that name?
Even if the world is lacking in your brand of ethics/morals doesn't mean you need to stoop to the same level as someone who doesn't hold the same brand of ethics/morals.